Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (197404)	3/17/2023 6:32:54 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 220016

an "estimate suggested"... Yeah. There's some solid statistical evidence for you... When you know the source is lying... there's really not utility in proceeding and pretending otherwise ? The jab... as applied... did more to accelerate and expand the pandemic than prevent it... as that's what is most likely given the KNOWNS in the function of the virus... and the CHOICES that were made in "how to"? The first most effective "difference maker" in Covid... was social distancing... most critically in getting people who were sick to quit acting like it didn't matter... and take responsibility to isolate themselves. The second most effective... was dramatically improved care of those hospitalized... so mortality was reduced... NOT because of coincident timing vis a vis the jab... but independent of the jab... Show me how "the statistics" for the jab... isolate its impacts from those of functional adoption of social distancing, and other control measures as were adopted ? Show me how "the statistics" for the jab... changed... when it was "out"... in context of OTHER changes applied synchronously... and how those changes were reflected in different populations ? And, then... show me how that changed... under the changing influence of variants... against which the jabs given were ineffective... or worse than ineffective... in context of error imposed in the "public health effort" in relation to behavior modifications enabled as part of it... Show how that means the jab used as a social compliance and behavior modification tool... could possibly lead to "the jab" being the reason for the statistical changes that were observed... in different populations ? <queue crickets chirping> They lied about its origins... They lied about the epidemiology... the math of its spread, and its mortality risks... They lied about its risks in relation to different population groups... They lied about the jab, in its safety, in its approval, in its liability, in its track record in testing... They lied about its efficacy... particularly under rotation in risks of changing variants... They lied about "non vax" alternatives to medical treatment... They lied about... every single thing there was to lie about... even "masks" working, or not... But... should probably trust them ?