SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PairGain Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: joe wiles who wrote (20652)2/13/1998 8:10:00 AM
From: helkel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36349
 
Hate to pump other stocks, but all look at ZRAN, announced news today with IOM, and has just bounced off of support......just want others to make $$$ in this market
i'm long and getting longer in pair and zran
pair is dead $ til options i feel (high of 21.5 wont be pushed through til the 23 unless we get news)
hk



To: joe wiles who wrote (20652)2/13/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: Marc Trombella  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36349
 
<<So with a forecast growth of 25%-30%and some negative sentiment primarily
based on the RBOC's cutbacks in capital spending, why would PAIR trade at a PE of 130??>>

Joe, there is no reason for PAIR to trade at a PE of 130. Here's the way I normally view PEs, although the market will sometimes dictate different. I look at the company's EPS growth for the current year. In the case of PAIR it is 25%. A reasonable PE is about 25. If you look at Yahoo, some analysts think, as hard as it may seem, that these internet companies will grow 100+%, hence PEs of 130. So assuming from a current Zacks's report on PAIR, a median EPS of 0.85, we get 20 11/16 / .85= 24.3. At a PE of 30, PAIR will be .85*30= 25.5. I think we'll see telecom equipment trade at a PE of at least 35 by year end. Last summer during "irrational exuberance", we hit a PE of 50 for PAIR. So the way I see it, as a worst case PAIR will be around $29.75. Hope this helps, let me know if you need some clarification.

Regards,
Marc