To: Ferick who wrote (8778 ) 2/13/1998 11:30:00 AM From: Charles A. King Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13091
Off topic ... While the attention of the public and news media is focussed on gossiping about the President's sexcapades, the real scandal is this nations' foreign policy, especially in the Arab world. Everybody wants the USA to end the suffering of the Iraqi people by "taking out" Saddam and saving everybody from the threat of his mass destruction capabilities. Everybody should realize that the only way to do that would be for troops to go over the entire country of Iraq inch by bloody inch, and hunt him down. The American people won't do that because they were cured of that forever by Johnson's Vietnam policy. The media's tapes of scuds supposedly being blown out of the sky by our missiles and by showing enemy buildings being blown up by smart bombs are supposed to make us believe that the basic rules of war have been changed somehow. I worked on smart bomb technology and on IFF. IFF means Identify Friend or Foe, and what we designed to fit into fighter aircraft could easily have been put on tanks and personnel carriers as well. There was absolutely no reason for us to kill our own people by accident. The people in charge of procurement just didn't give a damn. There is a movie called "Wag the Dog" which I guess is where a fictional president gets caught with his pants down and has a war invented to take the public's attention away from his personal scandal. Our real life situation is exactly the opposite. Here we have everybody's attention rivetted to Lewinsky/Jones/Flowers/Willey and so on and so forth, on and on, while the real disgrace to our country and to the extreme danger of our armed forces is in the way our Middle East policy is carried out. I have been watching the story of the latest invasion of Iraq by Turkey. Peter Jennings, Dan Rather, and Tom Brokaw never mention that, do they? Here we have two of our potential allies fighting among themselves because the Turks aren't invading Iraq to help us, they are there to fight the Kurds. The Kurds in the north of Iraq and the Shiites in the south would like nothing better than to get rid of Saddam. Why has the US government under both Democrats and Republicans refused to support the Iraqi opposition? The Iraqi army consisting of demoralized conscripts could easily be defeated by these fierce enemies of the Iraqi monster. All we would have to do is recognize them as the legitimate successors to Saddam, turn them loose, and send a few missiles into any tanks that come out to meet them. Instead the CIA eggs them on until they come out expecting our support, and the Iraqi army mows them down. Exactly the way Kennedy handled the Bay of Pigs and the way Eisenhower handled the Hungarians. The Saudis and other countries in the region can see our perfidy and dishonor with crystal clarity. They are now making other plans among themselves while the Russians, who already are owed $8 billion dollars by the Iraqis, are helping Saddam by assisting in building his mass killing capabilities. The French and Red Chinese are also helping because that is the way they are. I have no idea how this is going to play out, but I am willing to live with low energy prices if it keeps a million people from being killed. On the other hand, we have our own government working on increasing the price of oil by doing what they do. OK, I'll stop. Charles