SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1396325)3/27/2023 4:47:44 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577116
 
I don't recall the word 'defamation' but here's from your link

Why That Matters: If a court determines that Trump’s comments fell under the scope of his presidency and the federal government can be substituted as the defendant, it means Carroll’s case will almost certainly fail, the New York Times notes, as the government cannot be sued for defamation like individual citizens can.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1396325)3/27/2023 5:44:06 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577116
 
Wait, she sued him for defamation after he denied her accusation? Denying an allegation is not defamation. Just ask Stormy Daniels, who did the same thing and ended up owing Trump $200k.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News