Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mfgrep who wrote (9085)	2/13/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

mfgrep, I am not of the mind that any one individual must be plagued with self doubt to offer a valid opinion. A supportive opinion when supported with facts and figures and real events is simply a person who has made up their mind in the big picture. I do agree that there must be ongoing honest efforts to dicerne the truth, and that I think does happen here on the thread with some of our most active posters, but more so between posters not necessarily within every individual poster on both negative and positive sides. If you are not yet satisfied that FL contains PM's in high quantity, then keep tuned. The numbers will come. Naxos has spread out the testing to enough parties that numbers will start coming with great regularity in fact. Everyone must be satisfied to their own standard. But any one person who has done their DD, made up their mind, and supports their position with real events, I can't say that it is disingenuous or an effort to sell "swamp land". It's just an opinion...a positive one. This is just my very own opinion not intended to influence you in any way in any direction. Oh, by the way, I have a time share that if you sign a 2 year committment today, you can also get 6 floating weeks on the sunny coast of Sierra Del Fuego plus a complete dinner setting of Ginzu knives ;) Regards, Tom F.

To: mfgrep who wrote (9085)	2/14/1998 10:48:00 AM
From: ShoppinTheNet	Respond to of 20681

You post "As many pats on the back as we all deserve for the posts on this thread....this thread will never be the spur in the side of Naxos stock. And I certainly hope not!" this was in reply to my post stating ""Why would a potential investor consider investing in Naxos, after reading this thread? Almost all the current stockholders are filled with self-doubt and lack of trust". You missed one of the points I was trying to make here. From reading the last weeks posts to me it shows many posters have a lot of self doubt concerning Naxos. If this is true and you own Naxos, you are not investing in Naxos, you are gambling in Naxos. Any one looking into Naxos either by reading this thread or researching any other methods available, would come to the same conclusion. Therefore they would resist purchasing this stock unless they were gamblers as well. We a looking for big investors. Concerning postings questions or concerns I have no problem with that. But in this regard lets all thing back to some meeting we were in when someone complained and bitched about some problem and looked like an *ss to all present, only to watch a fellow partner twenty min. later make the same point professionally and be heard. As far as pom pom wavers and doomsday prophets, I offer this. Many years ago, a large American shoe manufacturer sent two sales reps out to different parts of the Australian outback to see if they could drum up some business among the aborigines. Some time later, the company received telegrams from both agents. The first one said, "No business here...natives don't were shoes." The second one said, "Great opportunity here... natives don't were shoes!" Now as a sales manager, I would have hired a third rep, one who sent a telegram that said "Great opportunity here ... natives don't were shoes and this is what we need to do to develop this market, and this is the cost associated with my plan.