Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (1397177)	3/31/2023 4:16:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578048

The only reason why I read that op-ed was because it was written by Alan Dershowitz. And quite frankly, I'm disappointed by what Mr. Dershowitz wrote. What exactly was "leaQed" anyway, other than the pending indictment itself, which was first announced by Trump himself? Dershowitz didn't say, other than the fact that there are multiple counts, which isn't exactly earth-shattering info. Then he makes the assumption that the whole case revolves around hush money to a pron star. But even he admits that he hasn't read the indictment yet (because you know, that didn't get leaQed). So why jump to that conclusion already? What's really rich is that he claims to have an open mind, when he has already accused Alvin Bragg of making s--t up. Again, it's the whole "misdemeanor turned into felony" line that the Q Continuum is echoing. In short, Dershowitz is jumping to conclusions already. Given his long track record as a successful defense attorney, I'm quite disappointed that he is starting to come under the influence of the Q. Tenchusatsu