Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ggersh who wrote (198313)	4/21/2023 7:51:12 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217656

I remember at some time in the past 48-72 months I asked this thread just how pervasive / material / serious or some such the transgender issue is given the election cycle mentions. I do not remember the responses from the thread except that it / they raise no alarms in my head. It / they sort of hit me when the coconut rushed, got pledged, and attended the mass bid-reveal of her supposedly tier-1 sortie when her profile along with the other sisters all had one sentence regarding pronouns. Was good and am happy that the coconut was a presumably self-described 'she/her', even as I would have been tolerant of any other combo after presumably at least some shock. Dunno. Not going there. I again ask the thread, how material an issue is the gender 'thing' as far as politics go? By question I mean, should Candidate A be sensible on every subject (economy, war / peace, technology, ... family values, ... track record) except intolerant on subject of gender self-selection by kids under age 21 / 18 / or 12, and Candidate B is a total disaster on all topics except being exceeding tolerant on gender self-selection, would candidate B have a chance to win?

To: ggersh who wrote (198313)	4/21/2023 9:21:55 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217656

Re <<It's Not Working>> according to DD brand spanking new tanks showing factory-new state are rolling up on the eastern / western front, depending on PoV, and if so, must question the claim that '97% of Russian military already in Ukraine and they are running out of tanks and munitions, and morale is poor' per UK defence source Nato domains best and quickly engage boots on the ground, never mind soil condition and forget weather outlook else, first quickly and then sudden accelerated surge, the state of arena might change for the worser If not for Ukraine, then for Lithuania and Poland t.me