Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (762)	2/13/1998 3:25:00 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Respond to of 6528

With all due respect, Pugs, I was looking only for a yes or no. It appears I have it. Thank you. As for importance, it just became important to me, though it wasn't earlier. Earlier it appeared important to others for some reason. Now it's important to me because it can now be stated with 100% certainty that either you or martin is lying.

To: Pugs who wrote (762)	2/13/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: gtoland	Respond to of 6528

For what it is worth. I saw the long version first and then the edited version later. I'm sorry to say that you have explained how the the short version came second if you only did one and why you did not get upset at someone impersonating you last night. IMHO gary :)

To: Pugs who wrote (762)	2/13/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: Buster	Respond to of 6528

Pugs, I was under the impression that Mike, while doing DD, called the alledged shorter to get his side of the story. How does that make it a relationship. It's not like they were dating:) Buster >Mike Kugler, a broker who had /has a relationship with an admitted shortseller of RMIL

To: Pugs who wrote (762)	2/13/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Respond to of 6528

Pugs, I want to make sure I've got this straight. You maintain that you did not edit that message in question after it was originally posted. Correct? The message as it appears now is exactly as it originally appeared?