Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sinew who wrote (1401978)	5/9/2023 4:03:36 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1579680

Trump lost a shit-ton of lawsuits alleging the election was stolen. prove it liar. politifact is not proof of anything Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor \| December 16, 2020 03:04 PM Sen. Rand Paul rejected the idea that courts have "decided the facts" on the integrity of November's presidential election. “The courts have not decided the facts,” Paul said Wednesday during a hearing on the integrity of the 2020 election. “The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections, and they stayed out of it by finding an excuse.” Paul pointed out while speaking with former special counsel Ken Starr that 60 court cases involving voter fraud claims in the election were thrown out for procedural reasons, which Starr agreed with, saying that the “vast majority” were thrown out for procedural reasons rather than merit. Paul also called on state legislatures to “reaffirm” that election law can only be changed by state legislatures, and he suggested that hearings should take place in the future to listen to state legislators and make sure that is happening. The Kentucky Republican told Starr that this legal aspect should be heard by the courts and stated that roughly two dozen states made changes to when and how ballots are counted against the will of state legislatures. Starr said election laws were “flagrantly violated” in Pennsylvania, which President Trump’s legal team has vehemently argued, and Paul agreed with that assessment. “The legal question there is a very easy one to decide,” Paul said. “Even as a physician, I can figure out that the secretary of state cannot create law.” He added: “I think there is a lot of work to be done.”