Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Things Weather and Mother Nature -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Green who wrote (369)	5/26/2023 3:42:10 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 937

Don, what I know based up my decades as an engineer and scientist is that CO2 is having mega positive impacks supporting higher standards of living for all life on Earth. The impacks of the increase of CO2 by 1.3 parts in 10,000 over the last 100 plus years cannot be measured in so called green house effect warming. It had led to a continuing increase of crop yields from year to year to year. There has been a greening of land area that is larger then area of CONUS. And all previous green area are producing 20 to 40% more biomass. Does this biomass absorb 20 to 40% more solar energy during the growing seasons. That energy would have been heating. Does all that biomass create friction to wind slowing it. There are dozens of processes. If you want to see what has happened to the weather as measured. Objective facts on 30 Climate topics. IN the early part of my career I was in involved in the art of Test Engineering and Science. This is about how do you find a binary question that tells that something is A or B. A trial determines guilt or not beyond a reasonable doubt. Climate change science is a very complex many science factors process.. A trial is about judging life based issues and jurors have life experience. But the science of Climate change is many area of specific experience. I have determined using all the known objective measurements that CO2 has had no measurable impact on "global" climate. Based upon comparisons of the so called models and measure temperature data that they are junk. As to the link above. If you look at it and then google the title, you will find dozens links to opinions suggesting that the information presented is slanted or false. But no citations of what is slanted or false. My test for human science understanding is a binary. Anyone who believes in Climate Crisis because of CO2 id a Science, Engineering, Technology ignoramus. Or they are a Bernie Madoff.