SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PSIX up 26.5%, Takeover(?) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ipv6 who wrote (2020)2/13/1998 6:30:00 PM
From: David N. Kunkel  Respond to of 5650
 
Dear ipv6;

Sorry, I'm of the old school, and not used to responding so impersonally to someone without a name or identity.

I understand your question. Ms. Duffy is not "reportedly" Bill Schrader's wife; she is in fact married to Bill. I have not been a long time reader or poster to this thread, as you know. In fact, it is only recently that I became aware of it. As for Ms. Duffy, she can speak for herself with respect to any postings she may have made. However, she is governed by the Securities Laws just as I am, and she cannot divulge material inside information nor attempt to manipulate our stock price any more than Bill or I can.

I have no doubt that any postings that Ms. Duffy may have made have contained her own opinion as a shareholder, and that she has done nothing to violate the securities laws.



To: ipv6 who wrote (2020)2/13/1998 6:51:00 PM
From: kathleen e duffy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5650
 
ipv6...and everyone.
Unlike many people on this thread, I have never hidden my real name NOR my "way long PSIX" status. That said, I have posted to this thread in order to clarify details about PSIX, public information, which I thought had been misinterpreted or misunderstood by posters to this thread. I am a large shareholder in my own right, with a mind of my own, and my words here are my own. Plenty of readers of this thread know who I am...it's public information. Who YOU are, ipv6, is more of a mystery.

Yup, I'm married to Bill. It could also be said that, had I identified myself publicly as Schrader's wife, undue attention (positive or negative depending on your disposition) would be paid to my comments. I just thought it best to just speak for myself. And I do. I don't think that's unethical or inappropriate.

-kate






To: ipv6 who wrote (2020)2/14/1998 10:32:00 AM
From: wtett  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5650
 
I suggest you go back and read each post by Kate over the last several months and inform the rest of us dummies of one single inappropriate statement made by her. She has shown great restraint and class in the face of a lot of criticism of Bill. I am grateful for her insight during these tough times in the stock:-) I didn't realize who she was, so my opinion of Bill just went up substantially:-)



To: ipv6 who wrote (2020)2/14/1998 12:54:00 PM
From: bob zagorin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5650
 
Dear ipv6.

I notice you just joined SI on Thursday, 2/13/98. There is no other inf. in your profile. While not required, many of us use our real names. It would be nice to know who you are and why you just dropped in on this thread. Are you long, short, a disgruntled employee, investor, part of a hostile TO group or just a sincere critic? What's the scoop?