Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Coley who wrote (47834)	2/13/1998 8:25:00 PM
From: Michael Coley	Respond to of 58324

RE: My Take on Iomega's Response. This is a GREAT response, especially coming from Iomega! I'm wondering if Kim's time spent with investors today and the lawsuit might actually be doing some good. Iomega is addressing the problems, putting a positive spin on it, and churning out press releases. (Is this the same company?) - Michael Coley - wwol.com

To: Michael Coley who wrote (47834)	2/13/1998 8:36:00 PM
From: gmccon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

From today's Zacks: RECOMMENDATION CHANGES: IOM: EMERALD RESEARC reconfirms the recommendation as Strong Buy on 02/06/98 _____________________________ Good. That'll help pay me for this: << Iomega's stock hit a record high, and at the same time, senior officers unloaded millions of dollars' worth of company stock at inflated prices, while continuing to represent that the Jaz 2 drive would be available in the fourth quarter of 1997. >> I'd like to be in the court room to watch these guys testilie. A good jury will see right through a smoke screen. If they agree that the allegation is true... I'm not in this company short or long (anymore), but if they owe me money, I want it, regardless of what happens to the company. Greg