SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (199320)6/6/2023 6:32:14 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217868
 
Re <<Wonder what the Amazon Post is doing?>>

... perhaps WaPo has yet to open the e-mail? Or the folks backing NYT is not precisely the same set as those backing WaPo; we wait for it.

The last time WaPo took a stand on the matter was back at beginning of this year, via a story about Meta editorial, appended below

Assuming for a moment that a slow pivot is indeed on, then full pivot might be best completed before end-Fall 2023, or at the latest, start-February 2024. IOW, coincidences need to happen, if pivot happening. My guess.

I cannot imagine what the spin would be should pivot happen. I lack imagination.

In the meantime we watch the counter offensive











































washingtonpost.com

Months after Russian invasion, Meta is tweaking its content policies

Meta is taking Azov Regiment off its dangerous organizations list
Naomi Nix


(Gabby Jones/Bloomberg)
Nearly a year after Russian forces invaded Ukraine, Facebook parent company Meta is tweaking its content moderation strategy over the bloody conflict.

The most recent change removed the Azov Regiment, a Ukrainian far-right military group, from the social media giant’s list of dangerous individuals and organizations. That change will allow members of the Azov Regiment to create accounts on Facebook and Instagram and post content without fear of it being removed unless it breaks the company’s content rules. The move will also enable other users to explicitly praise and support the group’s work.



To: carranza2 who wrote (199320)6/6/2023 7:20:25 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217868
 
Re <<slow>> by CSIS of the deep-state

Taiwan provincial electioneering shall soon start, to conclude ~March 2024, and regime-change expected that makes vector-change absolutely necessary

All should prove very exciting for the outgoing regime as names shall be added to lists

Samples and diagrams of US weapons delivered to Taiwan, Republic of China before and after the election will go to Shanghai and Shenzhen and Xi'an, and data shall quickly find ways to Russia, a guess

At the same time, Team Australia might have received the memo ahead of Teams Japan and S Korea, and if so, rug-pull in progress, for quite a few domains including UK

In any case, just in case, best to renovate Panda homes and fresh-paint ping pong tables

:0)))))

scmp.com

US and China can cooperate even in a time of heightened tensions, a House member says

- Representative Andy Kim, a Democrat on the House select committee on China, notes that working together ‘does not preclude deterrence or preclude competition’

- Remarks come at event to announce a joint project by the Brookings Institution and Centre for Strategic and International Studies on improving US-China collaboration



Bochen Hanand Igor Patrick in Washington
Published: 5:48am, 7 Jun, 2023



A vendor primps a Chinese and Us display during the Spring Carnival in Beijing on May 13, 2023. Photo: AP

A member of the House select committee on China argued for continued US-China cooperation despite increasing tensions at a think tank event Tuesday to unveil a new initiative on how the two countries might work together.

“Collaboration does not preclude deterrence or preclude competition or vice versa,” said Representative Andy Kim, Democrat of New Jersey, who also sits on the House foreign affairs and armed services committees.

Kim spoke at an event held by the Washington think tanks Brookings Institution and the Centre for Strategic and International Studies to announce a joint two-year project called “Advancing Collaboration in an Era of Strategic Competition”.

According to the CSIS website, the initiative will seek to “diagnose barriers now impinging on collaborative efforts” and “develop a playbook of best practices” to improve the effectiveness of collaboration across different domains.



US Representative Andy Kim, a New Jersey Democrat on the House select committee, said the US-China relationship was in the “early stages” of a paradigm shift. Photo: AFP

Kim called much of Capitol Hill “reactionary” and urged a longer-term, more “strategic” consideration of the bilateral relationship, placing it in the broader context of US national interests like climate change, global health and emerging technologies.

Kim called rhetoric on China from some fellow legislators that was “unhelpful, untrue and reckless”. Citing the Chinese balloon transit across the US in January, Kim recalled, one Congressional committee chairman had even said on TV “that perhaps there’s a biological weapon flying over the United States”.

The US and China, Kim contended, were in the “early stages” of a “new paradigm shift” and that a “tremendous opportunity” existed to redefine the relationship.

Kim’s remarks struck a different tone from much of the rest of the bipartisan 24-member committee, formally known as the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.

Since its establishment in January, the panel has largely focused its rhetoric and initiatives on countering Beijing. Though it has no legislative authority, it is mandated with presenting policy ideas to standing committees by the end of the year.

Last month, the committee released its first set of policy proposals, concerning human rights abuses in Xinjiang and defending Taiwan.

On Monday evening, members of the committee hosted Chinese dissidents at the US Capitol Building to commemorate the Tiananmen Square crackdown, with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy in attendance.

The Brookings-CSIS initiative will include historical case studies, practitioner and expert workshops, “proof of concept” exercises, strategy reports and translations of Chinese perspectives, according to the CSIS website.



Lily McElwee of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Photo: CSIS

Lily McElwee, a CSIS fellow who is one of the initiative’s core members, suggested that it would not seek cooperation “for the sake of cooperation”.

“When we think about China, we don’t have to play to a kind-hearted sense of … needing cooperation. We can play to their national interests,” she said.



To: carranza2 who wrote (199320)6/7/2023 7:47:55 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217868
 
Re <<Wonder what the Amazon Post is doing?>>

... all-good

situation normal

good-to-keep-going

when-atlantic-council-pens-op-ed-achieving-peace-ukraine

When The Atlantic Council Pens An Op-Ed On Achieving 'Peace' In Ukraine

BY TYLER DURDEN

THURSDAY, JUN 08, 2023 - 06:40 AM

Not the Babylon Bee, but this is what happens when a pair of writers at the Atlantic Council get op-ed space in The Washington Post.

It also proves that Neocon tentacles still have a firm grip on beltway thinking. Yes, they actually argue that peace can be achieved - or "the key to ending the war in Ukraine" - is by "attacking Crimea"...

[url=][/url]

Translation: only nuclear war can help us avoid nuclear war.

It's as if the absolute disasters of US interventions and wars from Iraq to Afghanistan to Libya to Syria--the latter where there's still an indefinite occupation in the war-torn country's northeast, never happened.

But this is what still passes for "respectable" foreign policy in the among the beltway blob, apparently.

"War is the health of the state," wrote political dissident Randolph Bourne (he was called a "radical" in his day) in the midst of the First World War. And later, Major General Smedley D. Butler agreed that "War is a racket" - according to the title of his famous book.

The Ukraine war is on track to be the most profitable conflict in all of human history, from the perspective of the major defense contractors at least.

Death, destruction, and mayhem in Eastern Europe as Lockheed & Raytheon and friends celebrate good times...

It's no wonder that peace talks have proven elusive.



To: carranza2 who wrote (199320)6/7/2023 8:10:06 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217868
 
Richards is fretting too much, unbecoming, requires cancellation
zerohedge.com
Rickards: How Does This End Well?

BY TYLER DURDEN
WEDNESDAY, JUN 07, 2023 - 11:20 PM

Authored by James Rickards via DailyReckoning.com,

It looks like the much-anticipated Ukrainian spring offensive may finally be getting underway. Yesterday, Russia repelled Ukrainian attacks in five places.

It’s very early — these were likely probing attacks looking to detect weak points in Russian defensive positions — but these attacks were much heavier than previous probing attacks.

We’ll have to see what happens.

When the main offensive comes, it’s very possible that Ukrainian forces will break through in certain areas. They might capture some territory (with plenty of U.S./NATO-supplied reconnaissance and intelligence to assist them), but it’s unlikely that their gains will be sustainable.

The offensive will probably peter out as Russian forces gradually grind it down.

Russia has several defensive lines in the region, fortified by minefields, anti-tank ditches, concrete obstacles known as dragon’s teeth, etc. These are formidable defenses that Russia has spent several months creating.

If Ukraine breaks through one line, it’ll have to confront another. And another. And another one after that.

It’s also important to realize that offensives on the scale envisioned require massive logistical support, and it’s far from clear that Ukraine has the resources to sustain a major offensive. It doesn’t help that Russia has been steadily targeting Ukrainian ammunition depots, transportation links, marshaling points, etc.

Meanwhile, Zelensky wants more Patriot missile systems. That’s because the Russians have already destroyed one-third of the systems we sent.

As I’ve argued before, Russia is winning the war. The West can’t afford to give Ukraine much more weaponry, and support for the war effort is declining.

[url=][/url]


Negotiation or Escalation

All that remains is negotiation or escalation toward nuclear war. Unfortunately, Biden will probably choose to escalate.

First he said no tanks, then he agreed to send tanks. Then he said no F-16s, now he’s agreed to send F-16s. There’s no reason to believe it’ll end there. Biden’s in way too deep to just walk away at this point.

And there’s certainly no reason to believe that Biden will relent on the anti-Russian economic sanctions. In fact, even more sanctions are being imposed.

Here’s the latest sanctions announcement from the U.S. as reported by Stratfor recently:

The United States enacted new sanctions on 69 Russian entities, one Armenian entity and one Kyrgyz entity, as well as halted the export of a wide range of up to 1,200 additional products and consumer goods to Russia, Reuters reported on May 19. The new sanctions and restrictions are part of the United States’ realization of the Group of Seven’s recent statement on Ukraine declaring the group’s intent to expand sanctions on Russia.
The measures suggest greater emphasis on blocking those who circumvent or facilitate the circumvention of sanctions, but the sanctions are unlikely to stop the emergence of new circumvention schemes or impede Russia’s ability to continue the war in Ukraine. Still, they will create new compliance risks for companies across a range of sectors from consumer goods to high technology that now must ensure that their business activities do not run afoul of the new measures.
In April, the International Monetary Fund further improved its forecast for Russia’s economy, which it sees growing by 0.7% this year, up 0.4 percentage points from the January forecast.



The Failure of Sanctions

The starting place for analysis is to realize that these anti-Russian sanctions are unprecedented as to the scope and the number of entities affected. The U.S. has frozen the bank accounts of the Russian Central Bank and a long list of Russian companies. It has kicked Russia out of the global interbank message traffic system called SWIFT.

It’s not too much to call SWIFT the central nervous system of the global financial system. Banning Russia greatly impedes the ability of their banks to make payments even if they are using currencies other than the U.S. dollar and transacting with non-U.S. banks.

U.S. companies by the thousands have closed up shop in Russia. They have either shut down their operations or temporarily suspended them. U.S. persons are prohibited from making new investments in Russia under pain of severe fines or imprisonment.

Strategic metals exports from Russia have been banned in many cases. Imports to Russia of semiconductors and other high-tech outputs and equipment have been banned. Russian oil exports by tankers have been prohibited.

This oil ban has been backed up by a separate ban on cargo and vessel insurance from major providers such as Lloyd’s of London. Without insurance, most parties won’t ship or purchase the oil.

The list goes on. New targets and sanctions are being announced continually. What has been the result of this global financial sanctions war?

It has been a complete failure. Russia is clearly winning the kinetic war on the ground in Ukraine, and it’s winning the financial war as well.

This Wasn’t in the Playbook

The Russian ruble is as strong as it was before the Russian invasion. Biden’s claim that sanctions would “destroy” the ruble was just hot air. The Russian economy declined about 3% in 2022 after critics claimed it would crash by 10% or more.

This year, Russia is projected to grow 0.7% by the IMF at a time when many analysts expect the U.S. economy to fall into a severe recession.

Russia has easily been able to evade sanctions on oil exports by using a “ghost fleet” of vessels that turn off transponders and engage in ship-to-ship oil transfers to mask the identity of the seller at the port of discharge.

There’s nothing surprising about this. Mastermind commodity trader Marc Rich did the same thing to evade oil export sanctions on Iran and Iraq in the 1990s and 2000s from his chateau in Zug, Switzerland.

The insurance bans have also proved ineffective. There are easy workarounds including self-insurance, captive insurance companies, and insurance from companies that are not participating in the boycott.

More recently, the U.S. has imposed further sanctions on two major gold mining companies in Russia. This is nonsense put on for show. Gold is an element, atomic number 79. Once it is melted and recast into generic bars it is untraceable. It can be moved secretly around the world by air and sold in markets from Shanghai to Singapore.

Gold is gold and it will go where it wants. The U.S. sanctions will have no impact except to increase costs in global trade.

The Desperation of Secondary Boycotts

Indeed, many of the most important countries in the world are maintaining a neutral stance and are not supporting U.S. sanctions. These neutral parties include India, China, South Africa, and Brazil, which collectively include almost 40% of the earth’s population.

India, China and Brazil are three of the ten largest economies in the world and collectively produce 24% of global GDP.

What’s new about the recent sanctions report quoted above is the U.S. is now getting desperate about the failure of sanctions to damage Russia or change Russian behavior in Ukraine.

The U.S. has begun imposing what are called secondary boycotts. This means that the sanctions do not target Russia directly, but target countries that do business with Russia and do not follow U.S. orders.

For example, China is reported to be selling semiconductors to Russia even as Brazil sells aircraft and India sells drones. China and India also purchase oil from Russia. It is also reported that South Africa has begun weapons sales to Russia.

All of these sales are in violation of U.S. sanctions. Reportedly, the U.S. will begin imposing separate sanctions on China, Brazil, India, and South Africa for not adhering to U.S. sanctions.

How Does This End Well?

These new secondary boycott sanctions will not be well-received. China, Brazil, India, and South Africa will not passively absorb the secondary boycotts.

They will retaliate in their own way. The tit-for-tax sanctions will not impede Russia at all, but they will lead to a further contraction of world trade, something last seen during the Great Depression.

Biden claims that the sanctions will not end until Russia withdraws entirely from Ukraine, including Crimea. Not only will Russia not withdraw, it continues to make major military and territorial gains. A Ukrainian offensive won’t fundamentally change that reality, unless it somehow manages to overcome very long odds.

This means the sanctions will continue indefinitely.

It also means Biden has created a major drag on world trade on top of the other headwinds already facing the global economy.

Investors will be well-served by allocating assets toward cash, gold, and other hard assets. These will be the real winners as the war in Ukraine drags on.