SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1405363)6/7/2023 2:41:01 PM
From: Broken_Clock1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bjzimmy

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577124
 
Yeah, because a key component of Crimea's long term success is to cut off its water supply.
Your ability to observe plain facts and then wrestle to distort same is legendary.

Your PDS has exceeded even dimwits like poco moose-boi.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1405363)6/7/2023 2:50:16 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 1577124
 
During the siege of Kherson, Mr. HIMARS hit the bridge next to the dam that was used for RuZZian supply routes. Ukraine didn't hit the dam itself.
Speaking of twisting...you'd do Sam Cooke proud.

korybko.substack.com

Wapo:

“Kovalchuk considered flooding the river. The Ukrainians, he said, even conducted a test strike with a HIMARS launcher on one of the floodgates at the Nova Kakhovka dam, making three holes in the metal to see if the Dnieper’s water could be raised enough to stymie Russian crossings but not flood nearby villages. The test was a success, Kovalchuk said, but the step remained a last resort.”