Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (830)	2/14/1998 1:35:00 AM
From: s martin	Respond to of 6528

You of course are putting your spin on something. He posted as a private citizen with no financial interest in RMIL In pursuit of the truth he contacted Mork, because of your allegations that Mork had a huge short position in the stock, MK offered to post a sworn statement from Mork. In what I think may have been a poor choice of wording he asked if that would make any difference to those who were banking on the fact that Mork was short millions of shares as you suggested. When no one said it would make a difference he said he wouldn't go to the trouble of obtaining the statement and posting it. He was IMO trying to illustrate that Mork's alleged short position was not the major factor that everyone was proclaiming it to be. I took his challenge to mean that he was calling your bluff and IMO he did. NASD told you in a generic way that if you had a complaint against a broker you should complain to that brokers's company. This is SOP for any complaints against brokers. You made it appear as if NASD told you specifically that MK was violating their rules.

To: Pugs who wrote (830)	2/14/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: s martin	Respond to of 6528

Pugs, Mike Kugler was not in violation of any statute as you imply. He was not "yanked" from posting on SI for any violation. He stopped posting soley because of the harassment of you and others toward his company and it's other employees. Not many companies would have the time and resources necessary to respond to every complaint made, even when they are not valid complaints. I do believe he and his company were upset at seeing the names of it's employees posted on SI. Posting the names of employees of the companies that SI members work for and officials of the SEC and NASD is not good form, if you want to further your cause. 15C....does not apply only to brokers, it applies to "anyone" as tonto has shown: To: +al-len (526 ) From: +tonto Thursday, Feb 12 1998 12:28PM EST Reply # of 862 United States Code Title 15-Commerce and Trade Chapter 2A-Securities and Trust Indentures Subchapter 1 Domestic Securities ...It shall be unlawful for any person, by the use of any instrument or transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, directly or indirectly- to employ any device,scheme, or artifice to defraud, or to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact, or any ommission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of circumstances under which they were made, not misleading... That appears to cover it very well...now about those superbowl teams...