Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ACLY- ACCELR8. Year 2000 Stock -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1074)	2/14/1998 1:54:00 AM
From: Pancho Villa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1518

Using Asensio's style probable outcome analysis, I have already posted in this thread the reason why, IMO, despite the DEC licensing agreement or any other neat press releases or contracts that may be handled with current and even substantially higher resources; generating the profits [free cash flows to be more precise] needed to justify the current market cap [or even when the stock the stock was at around 22] are difficult to achieve; IMO an outcome that would justify even a quarter of the current value is highly unlikely even if the y2k problem is a 3,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 problem. Longs may laugh given the current hype and crazy market environment, however the few smart ones would sell this outrageously overpriced stock at a handsome profit. Unlike what Michael Douglas greed is not good, it is foolish. Pancho