Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (1406452)	6/13/2023 7:40:47 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 Doren Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580072

Sdgla, like I said before, if Trump truly believed that the Presidential Records Act applied, he should have opposed the original request to return the documents. Or he should have fully complied. Many people, myself included, argued that he wouldn't have been indicted had he done just that. Either way, he tried to deceive the government. The evidence proves intent. He could be acquitted of every other charge as far as I know, but I believe he will be found guilty of obstruction. And given the lengths to which he tried to deceive the government, jail time seems to be warranted. I don't give a Brandon if he IS the leading candidate in the Republican primaries. No one is above the law. No one. Tenchusatsu

To: Sdgla who wrote (1406452)	6/13/2023 7:58:15 PM
From: Wharf Rat	3 Recommendations Recommended By Doren pocotrader rdkflorida2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580072

Where's Perry Mason when you need him? Whatever you think of the Trump indictment…ask yourself why it’s so difficult for him to find representation. pic.twitter.com/rw0uSw51Qe — PoliticsGirl (@IAmPoliticsGirl) June 12, 2023