SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcher who wrote (199556)6/16/2023 9:03:26 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Respond to of 219196
 
the art of hypersonic is about blindingly-fast speed paired with exquisitely fine manoeuvrability, and Team USA was hard at work on Mach 5 without success so abandoned the effort better to focus on Mach 10. China, is flying at Mach 12, working on Mach 18, planning on Mach 30, and can already down Mach 5

However, to do Mach XX, computer simulations do not cut it. One needs to work on cutting edge plasma physics, that which can really only be reliably studied just so ...

As with the case of quantum communication satellites, other Teams are way behind, by ~ 7+ years.

Simple function of how many brains can be thrown at any problem and work to resolution by multiple means faster

newatlas.com

China's record-breaking Mach 30 wind tunnel harnesses timed explosions

SCMP


The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has announced that the world's fastest hypersonic wind tunnel is up and running, a detonation-driven shock tunnel that'll allow aerodynamic testing for aircraft, spacecraft and missiles at air speeds up to Mach 30.

The idea of a wind tunnel is simple enough: if you want to know how a shape will perform at a given air speed, you build the shape, then hold it still in a test chamber and observe as air is blown past it at the desired speed.

If all you're testing is a car, you can get away with simply using big fans, and perhaps a looping chamber that keeps the air circulating to reduce the power draw. If you want to get your air up to the speed of sound, you can start choking the flow by reducing the diameter of your tunnel, but as Scott Manley explains in his charming Scottish brogue, that won't take you any faster, since the air just compresses and becomes more dense.

To go well into supersonic speeds, you actually have to widen the tunnel out again after the choke point, allowing the re-expansion of the compressed air to drive an even faster flow, just like in the exhaust nozzle of a rocket. Indeed, back in the 1960s, that's what a nascent NASA did at its Langley research center, effectively building a million-horsepower, high-pressure methane-burning rocket and sitting the test pieces, like heat-shield tiles from the space shuttle, in the nozzle at speeds up to Mach 7, letting bits that burned or broke off simply blow out the back into the swamp behind the tunnel.

Fans are no use generating these hypersonic speeds; you need pressure to drive hypersonic air flows. Indeed, you can hold a volume of super-pressurized, high-temperature air in one chamber, put a converging/diverging test tunnel after that and a big vacuum chamber on the other end, and achieve high Mach numbers in extremely short bursts.

For longer-duration experiments, you might look to something like an arc-jet tunnel like the one at the University of Texas-Arlington, which can push hot gas for up to 200 seconds at hypersonic speeds.

If you reckon you can keep the thing in focus with your cameras and instruments, you can fire an object through ambient air at hypersonic speeds at a ballistic range for a much closer simulation of the ambient air conditions. You'd better fire it straight, though, with no wobbles – and that's no simple task. Another option might be to partner up with a company like Varda, which will stick your test item and equipment to one of its "space factory" satellites, which de-orbit and enter the atmosphere at about Mach 25.



The Institute of Mechanics team with the JF-22 wind tunnel Chinese Academy of Sciences

But the JF-22 tunnel in China, completed in 2021 and now verified by 16 "independent experts" from China's National Natural Science Foundation (NNSF), takes things considerably further, claiming a world-leading Mach 30, or airspeeds of 6.4 miles per second (10.3 km/sec) through a huge experimental chamber with a diameter around 13 ft (4 m).

Located in northern Beijing, this is the latest in a JF-series of wind tunnels built at the CAS's Institute of Mechanics dating back into the 1950s, when, according to interviews translated by Hidden China, early attempts using hydrogen combustion-powered airflows would occasionally blow the roof off the building.

But it was this kind of detonation, not the relatively calm and controllable process of combustion, that would eventually lead to hypersonic test chamber speeds. A Mach 30 wind tunnel, according to the South China Morning Post, requires about as much energy as the entire Three Gorges Dam hydro power plant produces. Detonation releases extreme amounts of energy if you can keep it under control.

Thus, the JF-22 uses "a series of precisely timed explosions to generate a series of shock waves that reflect off each other and converge at a single point." Lead scientist on the JF-22 project, Professor Jiang Zonglin, dubbed this a "reflected direct shock wave driver."

The NSSF expert team "verified that the project team completed the project construction content and research objectives on schedule and in an all-round way, unanimously agreed to pass the acceptance, and evaluated the comprehensive performance indicators of the wind tunnel in terms of effective test time, total temperature, total pressure and nozzle flow field size."

While many early hypersonic wind tunnels were mainly focused on spacecraft, there's now much more focus on hypersonic missiles. Extremely difficult to intercept, some hypersonic missiles are also able to stay much closer to Earth than regular ICBMs, effectively hiding under the horizon and only popping up on radars at the target once they're perilously close and moving at insane speed.



The DF-17 ballistic missile is designed to carry and launch the DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle
??? / Wikimedia Commons

The CAS's previous hypersonic wind tunnel, the JF-12, is still operating at the same site as the new JF-22, and capable of speeds between Mach 5 and Mach 9. According to a Hypersonic Systems Development report from the US Air Force's China Aerospace Studies Institute, "the JF12 wind tunnel is believed to have played a crucial role in the development of China’s DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle." The highly maneuverable, nuclear-capable DF-ZF, launched from a DF-17 ballistic missile, is believed to operate in the Mach 5-10 zone, and first went into testing in 2014, two years after the JF-12 wind tunnel was first fired up.

So the new JF-22 tunnel, with its brief bursts of Mach 30 and large test chamber, definitely appears relevant to Western national security interests, even if the same report notes that a less well-publicized facility in Mianyang, also home to China's primary nuclear weapons R&D and production center, houses the largest wind tunnel facility in the world, with tunnels capable of simulating air speeds up to Mach 24. "Some foreign analysts regard the facility as the likely location of China’s scramjet engine hypersonic wind tunnel tests," reads the report.

Interesting times!

Sources: Chinese Academy of Sciences, South China Morning Post



To: marcher who wrote (199556)6/19/2023 12:00:19 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 219196
 
Let’s see if Team Russia steals the know-how

warriormaven.com

China Says Its DF-27 Hypersonic Missile Can Travel 8,000km - Warrior Maven: Center for Military Modernization

Kris Osborn, Warrior Maven - Center for Military ModernizationJun 12, 2023
By Kris Osborn, President, Center for Military Modernization

(Washington DC) China’s long-range DF-27 hypersonic missile may be as mysterious as it is lethal, given how little is known or confirmed about its performance parameters. The Pentagon documented and reported existence of the Chinese missile has been documented and reported by the Pentagon, according to its 2021 annual China military report.

Several years ago, the Pentagon was clear that the missile was “in development,” yet very little information is known about the potential extent to which the DF-27 is, in fact, a “hypersonic weapon.”

“Sources indicate a “long-range” DF-27 ballistic missile is in development. Official PRC military writings indicate this range-class spans 5,000-8,000km, which means the DF-27 could be a new IRBM or ICBM,” the report says.

A report from May 2023 in the South China Morning Post says the weapon is hypersonic and has been in existence for several years.

Regardless, what is clear about the emerging Chinese weapon, as specified by the Pentagon report, is that Chinese writings explain the missile can travel as far as 8,000km, a distance which can not only put Taiwan at risk but also threaten other key U.S. and allied areas throughout the Pacific.

Scroll to Continue

This range of 8,000km, which can generally be thought of as just under 5,000 miles, places South Korea, Japan, and Guam at risk of long-range ballistic missile attack. Guam, for example, is reported to be roughly 4,751km from mainland China and Japan is a similar distance of 4,518km. These distances place both Japan and Guam well within direct reach of China’s DF-27, a weapon that could fire from pretty much anywhere within mainland China, given the PRC’s well-known use of mobile launchers.

According to these specs, the DF-27 has a range comparable to many Russian, Chinese, and U.S. ICBMs, a possible reason why early Pentagon assessments suggest the weapon may indeed be an ICBM.

More recent press reports, however, have said the DF-27 weapon is, in fact, hypersonic. If true, such a prospect would introduce a new realm of threat to U.S. territories and assets in the Pacific theater. Hawaii, for example, is listed as being 5,939 miles (9,558km) from mainland China. California, by extension, is reported to be 6,715 miles (10,807) from mainland China, a distance which places the U.S. well within reach of China’s CSS-4 mod 2 & mod 3 ICBMs, which can travel 12,000 and 13,000km (7,456 and 8,078 miles) respectively, according to the bulletin of atomic scientists. China’s CSS-4 mod 4, which is slated to emerge next year, can travel 13,000km (8,078 miles) with multiple re-entry vehicles.

Given this, even if the DF-27 does not have the range of some Chinese ICBMs, it nevertheless seems to present problems for the U.S. and its allies in the Pacific, particularly if it can in fact travel at hypersonic speeds. A hypersonic ballistic missile traveling toward Japan or Guam would present a much more significant threat than a standard ballistic missile as there would be much less time for commanders to determine the optimal countermeasure or counterattack.

Part of the challenge with a weapon such as this, and part of the mystery, likely pertains to the kinds of guidance systems the DF-27 has. A hypersonic missile of that range, with course-correcting or even precision guidance, would clearly present challenges for air and missile defenses in Japan or Guam. However, with the proliferation and rapid arrival of large numbers of medium-and-low-earth-orbit satellites, the Pentagon is working on several cutting-edge efforts to “network” nodes to one another and develop a “continuous” track on a hypersonic missile with a mind to potentially intercepting it.

Kris Osborn is the Military Affairs Editor of 19FortyFive and President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Sent from my iPhone