Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (5267)	2/14/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: Fulvio Castelli	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

If I may be so bold as to answer for Mr. Carson, I believe this is what you're looking for: forums.stockhouse.com

To: the Chief who wrote (5267)	2/14/1998 1:05:00 PM
From: tanoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Hello Chief; Without being dis-respectful Chief, this has been the situation that is confusing many, people really believe that this court ruling is about title, it is not, it is the mineral rights, that were improperly awarded to the CVG. He has answered these questions on numerous occasions, may I suggest that you either e-mail him, or look up his responses on the SH forum, or go to SH if your a member, and scroll down to his name, and start looking back, you will find his responses to those questions, he has been asked many a time, I am not in contact with Roy Carson. I just posted what he has this AM, on SH. It has been officially gazetted in Venezuela that I.M. has title Chief, this ruling has nothing to do with title. By Venezuelan laws, mineral rights go with the title, this is about getting those rights back, people must understand the difference. With regards,Frank