To: Cosmo Kramer who wrote (1675 ) 2/14/1998 11:25:00 AM From: Gutterball Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6464
I'm proud of you guys! We seem to have a nice little discussion going. Mark, that was a nice little dissertation or should I say prayer, too bad you prefaced it with "I believe the SEC rumor to be fake" in your previous post. Kind 'a blows away the ole credibility. Guess I'm going to have to call you Peg Leg or perhaps you prefer One Eye--not to be confused with Dead Eye of course. Message 3425930 Ratman, Message 3432031 Sorry you think I put a negative spin on everything, I just believe its time for introspection and that means taking a hard look at both sides. Savvy investors do that you know? Now, for all you who thought the SEC rumor was a fake, I suggest you take a look at this post again, messages.yahoo.com @m2.yahoo.com It has some interesting comments. Maybe somebody can follow up on them and see how many are real. This SEC investigation is serious, it has the potential to shut BAT down--so don't blow it off. BAAT wanted to keep it a secret, that speaks to motive in itself. Forty-six categories of documents including a complete copy of the company's bookkeeping records. How would you feel, if ole Joe traded on the SEC information? Well that's one thing we will find out! Believe me, if the SEC wanted to fine anything wrong, it could. Bad thing is, they will be going over BAT's records with a fine tooth comb. BAAT is the patient, SEC is the doctor and the patient doesn't treat the doctor. Ole Joe brought this on himself by not filing--this speaks to his leadership ability and bring into question if he's the man for the job. You'd think an honest shareholder would want to consider this. Had he filed under normal circumstances, the SEC review may have been a routine grease job, but my guess he's going to get a hands-on hand job. (That's for those who still know how to laugh) . BTW, I'll concede BAAT could be a billion dollar company in 10 years if you concede a billion shares.