Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (1407777)	6/24/2023 2:53:21 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By pocotrader Respond to of 1584252

Tom Riddle, You didn't address a single point Barnes made. Wrong. I DID address them. However, I chose not to refute them because the PRA argument has already been refuted by multiple sources. Moreover, the burden of proof is on Barnes. He needs to point out in the letter of the law that the PRA doesn't apply to presidents, and that presidents have the absolute power to do WTF they want to do with classified documents, including take them and declare them "personal items" by implication. He can't do that, except to bring up dEeP sTaTe dEeP sTaTe dEeP sTaTe as his justification. Like a woman, however, you did let us know all about your personal animosity towards various people. I don't have any personal animosity toward Barnes. He was part of Kyle Rittenhouse's team of lawyers, after all. I expect Barnes to do his job as a defense attorney. The only one I have personal animosity towards is Trump. He makes a mockery of objective trust, and he's trying to destroy public trust in our system of representative democracy. All to save his own fat ass. Tenchusatsu