SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask John Galt... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (3676)2/14/1998 4:02:00 PM
From: Ignacio Mosqueira  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4006
 
Christine, read your post and you will see what I meant about outcomes. Society has come a long way from the days when the wise village elder was the law. What you are telling me is your interpretation of how the law should function and now how it actually does. Are you saying that married couples can not work together? What if they get divorced and then relapse on the job. Please do not repeat yourself again if you do not wish. That is not what I am asking for. It just does not seem to me that you have thought through all the implications of your position. Lots and lots of cases fall through the cracks. But do answer this: is it ok if no one complains? That is should the LAW (I am not asking your personal opinion) think it is ok.



To: Grainne who wrote (3676)2/17/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4006
 
Just to toss another cat onto the barbecue - aren't we having sex with an underling every time we're on top? Excepting of course those of us who prefer a side-by- side position, or the VERY few of us who've had sex in zero gee. Two, maybe three (!) Russians with big grins.