Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1409030)	6/30/2023 5:25:40 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579770

Wharfie, they counted every instance of a suburban white guy shouting anti-Asian slurs as part of the mix. But I think there's a huge difference between a white loser who is shouting anti-Asian slurs, and some "unhoused" person in the city mugging, stabbing, or otherwise causing serious injury to Asians. Even this study admits the disparity, though they do it in a way that draws some sort of moral equivalence between the two: Karthick Ramakrishnan, founder of AAPI Data, for which Wong also works, said that the public’s perception of perpetrators and victims is largely formed by the images from videos that have gone viral. *But most security videos tend to be from low-income areas where there is more surveillance than in better-off areas, creating a lopsided impression, he said.* First of all, that's bullshit. "Better-off areas" are practically covered in Ring cameras. And second, you don't see too many videos of anti-Asian hate crimes in "better-off areas" because of what I said before. The more serious hate crimes tend to go viral more often than some white loser shouting at Asians. Bottom line is that you're reposting *boba liberal* bullshit, Wharfie, just as you are expected to. Tenchusatsu