SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (200019)7/3/2023 8:13:25 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218134
 
Re <<It’s significantly more complex than rare earth minerals. There is a myriad of items on which both countries depend on each other.>>

I think you are correct. I am guessing as the galaxy is bifurcating, each halve of the galaxy shall and must be able to do what the other halve can do, might do, and want to do, and out of the duplication of efforts some 2 + 2 > 4 ought to make appearance, albeit at some cost.

The cost <=> benefit is irrelevant, therefore inflation in-in, and gold (sorry, I meant 'lovely lovely gold') ought to do ~ 6 - 8.0 - 10% per annum generally, barring spikes up and down, and barring sovereign seizure (which would only drive the pricing further up in all fiat currencies)

Somethings are making me feeling that Globalisation 2.0 and Cold War 2.0 are quite different from earlier edition of same-same.

(1) Cold War 2.0 latest (last two weeks?) is that because Russia & China making missile early warning systems interoperable and seamless, meaning without daylight in between stuff, five 'things' shall happen, the rumour goes

(1-i) China's supplementary but interoperable missile warning system shall face east, west, south, and south

(1-ii) Russia's supplementary but interoperable missile warning system shall face east, west, and partially south, and partially north (west of Ural mountain range)

(1-iii) China + Russia supplementary and interoperable missile warning system shall face north, but to be located in both the Arctic as well as Siberia, and with command nodes in both Russia and China, jointly staffed, for the Arctic, and sovereign staffed in Siberia

(1-iv) Russia shall help China to achieve nuclear parity w/ Russia,

(1-v) China shall help Russia to do intermediate-range rocketry parity w/ China, and to do orbital bombardment as necessary where rockets go in any direction, fly for any length of time, towards any direction, and unload hypersonic sub-munition at any place, conventional and nuclear

some of the above activities shall involve sharing of ideas, trading of stuff, and some shall involve build-operate-train-transfer. Cold War 2.0 is looking different than 1.0.

(2) Globalisation 2.0, under terms of mutual respect, equality of status, territorial integrity, national governance sovereignty, etc etc and all for one and one for all, BRICS+ as well as SCO expansion in the cards, starting with the upcoming session, and am guess goal is to proto-parallel the United Nations within 72 months. Believe first up includes Saudi Arabia and Iran both, possible one in each organisation, and be observer in the other, or skip the trial and each be in both entities.

Now below I am guessing more wildly, that the gaming shall entail ...

(3) Sovereign defaults shall mass-happen, to go well with mass debt jubilee

(4) Anyone shorting stocks are committing financial suicide

(5) Socialisation of pension losses must happen

(6) Cities burn due to dislocation of reset that must be expected, and digital currencies, 24-7 monitoring, networked and remote kill-switch cars make sense, same same social crediting, etc etc shall go wide and deep, else societal breakdowns happen

(7) I am not sure how Ukraine figures in all of the above but suspect Ukraine is balled up in the above

(8) W/r to Politico, I had been aware of the dysprosium but not the terbium issue, and haven't a clue of what either looks like, but they sound like acupuncture pressure points politico.com
Together, China and Myanmar produce 100 percent of the world’s “heavy” rare earth elements, primarily dysprosium and terbium. Distinguished from “light” rare earths by their higher atomic numbers, heavy rare earth elements “blanket” the strongest rare earths magnets to protect them from high temperatures, said Ryan Castilloux, founder of the independent research group Adamas Intelligence. They are used in stealth aircraft, missiles and other military equipment.
“While China dominates production as a whole, its grip is greatest on the heavy rare earths,” he said. “It’s a relatively small, niche segment of demand overall, but very strategically important to almost any modern nation.”


... and Politico forgot to mention "yuchuanite-(Y)" because of publication date, so excusable :0)))
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202302/1285430.shtml
China recently discovered a new rare-earth mineral in South China's Guangdong Province, which was named after a senior Chinese mineralogist Chen Yuchuan, further supporting rare-earth resources exploration in the region.
According to the official website of the Institute of Mineral Resources under Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), the new mineral named yuchuanite-(Y) was discovered by Liu Peng, researcher of CAGS and associate professor of State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics under Northwest University (NWU), in Yushui copper mine which is located in northeastern Guangdong Province.


In the meantime, August 1st is the day, according to Bloomberg (heart medicine is also not rare, but if located in the bedroom and needed in the garage, a supply chain issue arises)

bloomberg.com

China Restricts Export of Chipmaking Metals in Clash With US

Beijing will limit gallium and germanium exports from Aug. 1 Both metals are indispensable for producing some chips

Alfred Cang
3 July 2023 at 23:45 GMT+8

China imposed restrictions on exporting two metals that are crucial to parts of the semiconductor, telecommunications and electric-vehicle industries in an escalation of the country’s tit-for-tat trade war on technology with the US and Europe.

Gallium and germanium, along with their chemical compounds, will be subject to export controls meant to protect Chinese national security starting Aug. 1, China’s Ministry of Commerce said in a statement Monday. Exporters for the two metals will need to apply for licenses from the commerce ministry if they want to start or continue to ship them out of the country, and will be required to report details of the overseas buyers and their applications, it said.

Read more: What Are Gallium and Germanium? Niche Metals Hit by China Curbs

China is battling for technological dominance in everything from quantum computing to artificial intelligence and chip manufacturing. The US has taken increasingly aggressive measures to keep China from gaining the upper-hand and has called upon allies in Europe and Asia to do the same, with some success. The export limits are also coming at a time when nations around the world are working to rid their supply chains of dependencies on overseas equipment.

Impact on the tech industry “depends on the stockpile of equipment on hand,” said Roger Entner, an analyst with Recon Analytics LLC. “It’s more of a muscle flexing for the next year or so. If it drags on, prices will go up.”

China is the dominant global producer of both metals that have applications for electric vehicle makers, the defense industry and displays. Gallium and germanium play a role in producing a number of compound semiconductors, which combine multiple elements to improve transmission speed and efficiency. China accounts for about 94% of the world’s gallium production, according to the UK Critical Minerals Intelligence Centre.

Still, the metals aren’t particularly rare or difficult to find, though China’s kept them cheap and they can be relatively high-cost to extract. Both metals are byproducts from processing other commodities such as coal and bauxite, the base for aluminum production. With restricted supply, higher prices could draw out production from elsewhere.

“When they stop suppressing the price, it suddenly becomes more viable to extract these metals in the West, then China again has an own-goal,” said Christopher Ecclestone, principle at Hallgarten & Co. “For a short while they get a higher price, but then China’s market dominance gets lost - the same thing has happened before in other things like antimony, tungsten and rare earths.”

Read More: Why the Fight for ‘Critical Minerals’ Is Heating Up: QuickTake

Other countries that produce gallium include Japan, South Korea, Russia and Ukraine, according to the CRU Group, a metals industry intelligence provider. Germanium is also produced in Canada, Belgium, the US and Russia.

Shares of companies that make compound semiconductors, such as Wolfspeed Inc. and NXP Semiconductors NV, were little changed or traded higher when US exchanges opened on Monday. A representative for Wolfspeed didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for NXP had no immediate comment.

China’s move comes after the US and its allies stepped up rhetoric against the country in recent weeks. US President Joe Biden’s administration is planning to block sales of some chips used to run artificial-intelligence programs, people familiar with the matter said last week. The Chinese government earlier this year banned US chipmaker Micron Technology Inc.’s products from some of its critical sectors after saying it found “relatively serious” risks in a cybersecurity review.

The Dutch government announced on Friday measures that will prevent ASML Holding NV — a company with a near-monopoly on the machines needed to make the most advanced semiconductors — from selling some of its machines to China.

— With assistance by Debby Wu, Thomas Seal, Clara Hernanz Lizarraga, Benoit Berthelot and Scott Moritz

(Updates with analyst comment in fourth paragraph, additional details throughout)

bloomberg.com

What Are Gallium and Germanium? Niche Metals Hit by China Curbs

China will limit exports of two key metals from August It’s the latest step in a tit-for-tat trade war on technology

Archie Hunter
4 July 2023 at 03:27 GMT+8



Photographer: Patrick Pleul/dpa-Zentralbild/picture alliance/Getty Images

China is clamping down on exports of two obscure yet crucial metals in an escalation of the trade war on technology with the US and Europe.

But what exactly are gallium and germanium and how important are they? Here’s a quick recap:

What happened?

Beijing announced it will impose curbs on both metals, along with their chemical compounds, in order to protect Chinese national security starting Aug. 1. Exporters will need to apply for licenses from the commerce ministry if they want to start or continue to ship them out of the country and will be required to report details of the overseas buyers and their applications.

What are gallium and germanium?

Both silvery-white in appearance and commonly classified as “minor metals,” the metals aren’t typically found on their own in nature. Instead, they’re produced in small concentrations as a byproduct from refineries focused on other, more mainstream raw materials like zinc or alumina.

The markets are tiny when compared with other commodities like copper or oil — for example, US imports of gallium metal and gallium arsenide wafers in 2022 were valued at only about $225 million according to government data. But their use in strategic industries mean that the curbs could still have far-reaching impact.

What are they used for?

The two metals have a vast array of specialist uses across chipmaking, communications equipment and defense. Gallium is used in compound semiconductors, which combine multiple elements to improve transmission speed and efficiency, in TV and mobile phone screens, solar panels and radars. Germanium’s uses include fiber-optic communication, night-vision goggles and space exploration - most satellites are powered with germanium-based solar cells.

How important is China?

Trade flows in these small and niche markets are tricky to track, but China is overwhelmingly the top source of both metals — accounting for 94% of gallium supply and 83% of germanium, according to a European Union study on critical raw materials this year.

And while both metals can be substituted, doing so could cost more and may hinder performance of the technology, according to CRU Group, a metals industry intelligence provider.

So can other countries produce more?

Neither metal is particularly rare, but processing costs can be high. Because China has exported them relatively cheaply for so long, there are few facilities elsewhere to extract the metals. As China increased its production, other countries including Germany and Kazakhstan have pared back.

But if China’s move sends prices soaring, analysts expect production from other suppliers will rise to meet demand.

Recycling could also be key. Factory-floor scrap already accounts for some supply, while germanium scrap is also recovered from the windows in decommissioned tanks and other military vehicles, according to the USGS.

Where else are the metals produced?

Excluding China, other countries with gallium production capacity include Russia and Ukraine, where the metal has been produced as a byproduct of alumina, as well as South Korea and Japan — as a byproduct of zinc. In North America, germanium is recovered alongside zinc, lead and other metals at Teck Resources Ltd.’s Trail smelter in British Columbia.

Other producers include specialty materials maker 5N Plus Inc., and Indium Corporation in the US. In Europe, Belgium’s Umicore SA is a producer of both metals.

And some mining projects contain higher concentrations of the metals and could offer an opportunity to increase supply — such as the Kipushi zinc project expected to start up next year in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

— With assistance by Ian King



To: carranza2 who wrote (200019)7/5/2023 7:15:34 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Respond to of 218134
 
Re <<It’s significantly more complex than rare earth minerals. There is a myriad of items on which both countries depend on each other.>>

I am told that there is a move in USA to de-chain China pharmaceutical active ingredients from USA users.

That shall surely add to inflation, because China makes something for a lot of stuff that goes into most end-use drugs and as ONLY supplier. I do not know the veracity of that calculation.
Cursory research of big topic to get a sense of where the trade war might be going, even as I cannot fathom why.

asia.nikkei.com
The great medicines migration
April 5, 2022




China’s global vaccine gambit

This is a series exploring China’s vaccine strategy, capabilities and role in the global health supply chain — and how it fits into preparations for the next pandemic.

By the pandemic year of 2020, China accounted for the bulk of exports of certain pharmaceutical raw materials. The country now plays an indispensable role in the supply chain for antibiotics and vitamins.

China’s share of global exports of key pharmaceutical ingredients in 2020, by volume

Tetracycline/Doxycycline

Data may contain chemical compounds for other uses
Source: Trade Map



In spring 2020, Ryotaro Katsura, president of Katsura Chemical in Japan, was fretting over a delayed shipment of a pharmaceutical raw material from India. “No worries, no worries,” the Indian supplier kept insisting. Over numerous phone calls and emails, Katsura kept pressing, and finally discovered the source of the problem.

A chemical used to produce the material was made by only one supplier, located in China, which was gripped by the early pandemic and lockdowns.

COVID-19 has brought to light just how much the global pharmaceutical supply chain depends on China, even for the most basic chemical building blocks.

This is the final part of a Nikkei Asia series on Beijing’s ambitions to become the center of the global drug industry. This entry focuses on China’s command of the market for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) -- a dominance some Western countries are attempting to overturn as the pandemic and geopolitical tensions expose this supply chain vulnerability.

Sea change

China has become a major pharmaceutical player in recent decades as production has moved from West to East. This has included its emergence as the top producer of APIs.

How a finished drug is produced



Put simply, an API is a component of a drug that impacts health -- for example, suppressing a disease or its symptoms. Broken down further, APIs are the result of integrating substances known as key starting materials, or KSMs, and intermediates. Few pharmaceutical companies handle the whole process, from KSM to finished drug. Most import at least some materials, especially generic drug makers. And most roads lead to China.

“If you follow the supply chain, you will bump into China sooner or later,” said Ichiro Fujikawa, chairperson of the Japan Pharmaceutical Traders’ Association.

Until the mid-1990s, the West and Japan reportedly produced 90% of the world’s APIs. But the U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency estimated in 2017 that China alone was producing about 40% of all APIs.

Its actual influence may reach even farther.

This reporter experienced the Chinese medicine connection firsthand after suffering from a severe stomachache. A doctor diagnosed a case of bacterial gastroenteritis and issued prescriptions, including a generic antibiotic called levofloxacin. The drug’s API came from three possible sources, one from China and two from Japan. However, it turned out both Japanese producers imported the pre-purified API from China.

China has an advantage in “the low-cost and off-patent APIs” like antibiotics or vitamins, according to Deloitte. This is because production costs are lower there than in Western nations. The country’s large share of APIs looks even greater if one follows the trail upstream to KSMs, which are often simple yet versatile chemical substances produced in bulk.

Even India, another pharmaceutical giant often considered to be an alternative to China, depends heavily on Chinese supplies. According to the European Commission, India accounts for about 20% of global generic drug demand by volume, but it imports about 70% of the APIs from China. For some drugs, such as the painkilling and anti-inflammatory ibuprofen, India procures the vast majority of the APIs from China, according to the Pharmaceuticals Export Promotion Council of India (Pharmexcil). Moreover, while India is one of the biggest API exporters, many KSMs and intermediates of those APIs come from China.

Race to the cheapest

For Western pharmaceutical companies that used to produce their own APIs, sourcing from China and India made sense -- dollars and cents, to be precise. The emerging countries could make the ingredients for less, under looser environmental standards.

API registration data illustrate the shift. In 2021, China topped new submissions under the Drug Master File system, a registry of detailed information on APIs managed by Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. API makers submit their data for future marketing in Japan. Until the early 2010s, Japan and Europe accounted for the majority of submissions, but both China and India have since increased their presence.

China’s share of API production is growing rapidly
ChinaIndiaEuropeU.S.OtherNew applications of Certificates of Suitability (CEP) submitted by country (in percent)



Source: European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM)

The same trend can be observed in Europe. The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare issues quality certificates for APIs called Certificate of Suitability (CEP). China’s share rapidly increasing -- it now accounts for more than 20% of new applications. In addition, data show that some chemical substances, such as the high-cholesterol medication simvastatin, do not have European certificate holders behind them. Although the CEP does not contain information about the location of production, this suggests that even if these APIs were produced in Europe before, this is no longer the case.



“There was high pressure for manufacturers to offer a low price,” said Andreas Meiser, Partner at life science consultancy MundiCare. The strategy for achieving this was “mainly to outsource the API production to Asia, especially China and India.”

Rise of the generics

Generic drugs -- typically much cheaper versions of branded treatments -- have emerged as a crucial means for countries to reduce national health care expenditures. As a result, they have spread rapidly.

According to IQVIA, an American health-care consulting company, generics account for about 90% of all prescribed drugs in the U.S., up from 50% in 2005.

Producers are under especially high pressure to limit costs. The only thing that makes a generic drug competitive is price. According to German generic industry group Pro Generika, the average cost of a daily dose of such drugs is only six euro cents in Germany – as cheap as a piece of bubblegum.

China enjoys an API production cost advantage
API production total cost breakdown; India = 100 (in percent)



Source: KPMG, CIIWhen it comes to API prices, China has a significant edge. According to KPMG India’s research, a drug generally can be produced for 20% less in China than in India. This is largely thanks to cheaper raw materials, which can be up to two-thirds of the total production cost.

India relies on China for many API raw materials
China’s share of imports, 2020-21 (in percent)



Source: DGCI&S

For example, lamivudine, an antiretroviral medication for HIV, costs $120 per kilogram if produced by a Chinese manufacturer, compared with $137 if made in India.

Raw realityOne reason India is struggling to produce cheaper APIs is that fewer Indian manufacturers produce raw materials such as KSMs and intermediates. Cytosine, the KSM for lamivudine, is rarely produced in the country. Many Indian API manufacturers therefore import the materials, mainly from China.

China’s production-scale advantage

Average manufacturing capacity comparison between China and India (in tonnes)



Source: KPMG, CII

China has a huge production scale advantage as well. For some APIs, Chinese companies have more than twice the capacity of their Indian counterparts. The average Chinese production capacity of amoxicillin, an antibiotic for bacterial infections, is 14,000 tonnes. In India it is just 5,000, according to research by KPMG India and the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII).

The Chinese government itself has clearly understood the value of the API industry. Since the 2000s -- the same time as the eastward migration of API factories -- the government has implemented numerous laws and regulations that have encouraged API production. These include the Administrative Measures for Drug Registration in 2005, which enabled quicker approvals. APIs are “the long-term advantage of China's pharmaceutical industry to participate in international competition,” China’s National Development and Reform Commission said in November 2021.

Western pharmaceutical companies appear to have contributed to the growth of the Chinese industry. Some gave China the specifications “for making their generic drugs including antibiotics, and the reason they did that, in return, [was that] they would be given access to China’s market for lucrative branded products,” said Rosemary Gibson, a senior adviser with the Hastings Center, the U.S. based bioethics research institute, and author of “China Rx: Exposing the Risks of America’s Dependence on China for Medicine.”

There is another reason Western players were willing to offload this aspect of drug-making: APIs can be a rather dirty business.

Because API production involves chemical reactions, their environmental impact came under increased scrutiny in Western countries. in the 2000s. Processes like fluorination and chlorination raised concerns over “the accumulation of dangerous material in the reactor and the safety risk for the operators and the environment in case of containment failure,” according to the European Fine Chemicals Group (EFCG), a chemical industry group in Europe. Research by PwC in France found that every manufacturing step to produce an API relied on potentially polluting technology that could leave chemical waste in the air, water or soil. Handling the dangerous waste left by such processes and ensuring safety can be costly for companies.

“For the chemical side of the industry, these [APIs] are sometimes toxic chemicals that are being manufactured, so to produce in Europe, you need to have either highly sophisticated production techniques or anti-pollution technologies, or you will never be able to manufacture them here,” said Adrian van den Hoven, director general at Medicines for Europe, a generic lobby group.

Elisabeth Stampa, CEO at Spanish API manufacturing company Medichem, explained the difficulty of clearing such hurdles in Europe.



Stainless steel and glass lined reactors suitable for multi-product manufacturing in the Celrà Plant in Girona. European environmental regulations have raised the bar for producing pharmaceutical ingredients on the continent, in some cases pushing the industry eastward. (Courtesy of Medichem)

“We have changed the processes [of production] for environmental reasons. Each change is associated with significant R&D, regulatory and industrial work because you have to test, you have to validate, you have to see the final API is exactly the same as it was in the other process, and our customers have to accept the change and update the regulatory filings,” she said. She conceded that “in some cases, we have to stop producing products for price reasons eventually.”

Stampa called for incentives to make it more economically sustainable for companies to address environmental and climate objectives.

In her view, cost-containment measures in Europe have generated a number of undesirable effects, such as reduced competition, price erosion and supply constraints. Stampa told Nikkei Asia that her company has changed its processes for an antidepressant called amoxapine and an antipsychotic called loxapine to adjust to new environmental standards. However, some APIs are simply no longer economically viable -- Medichem has dropped production of several, such as metoprolol for high blood pressure.

The solution becomes the problem

Katsura Chemical, the Japanese company that suffered delivery delays in early 2020, is hardly the only one exposed to the consequences of the supply chain shift.

Soon after the pandemic began, German contract development and manufacturing company Corden Pharma was unable to import KSMs from China for a short period. This “eventually affected both generic and innovative APIs,” said CEO Michael Quirmbach.

Spooked by COVID-19, the Indian government in April 2020 slapped export restrictions on APIs for drugs like paracetamol, a painkiller, and clindamycin, an antibiotic. Although local demand was high at the time, the APIs in these drugs are also among those that depend on Chinese ingredients.

Bork Bretthauer, managing director at Pro Generika, noted that “the cost of KSM production is often quantity-dependent, so the more a company produces, the cheaper it is to produce per unit volume. In order to get the cheapest offer the market consolidates over the years.”

As Katsura Chemical discovered, there are often very few manufacturers in China that can make certain materials for a drug, even if the materials are relatively simple to produce. Sometimes, there may even be only one.

Katsura added that some Chinese producers “probably do not know that they are the only ones to produce certain KSMs, since many companies gradually exited the market due to low profitability.”

Supply chain worries did not emerge suddenly with COVID-19. "The geographic concentration of the supply chain was a primary concern for our company way before the COVID pandemic started," said Andrew Gradozzi, who leads the generic API business at Italy-based API company Dipharma.

Sometimes, Dipharma could not find a reliable second supplier of intermediates or KSMs. For this reason, Gradozzi told Nikkei, the company has sought to geographically diversify its sources and started "in-housing production of selected raw materials" to minimize exposure to shortages.

API manufacturers are geographically concentrated within China

The U.S.Japan
Manufacturers registered with Japanese PMDA or U.S. FDA as of January 2022


Source: Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), U.S. FDA

Even within China, API manufacturing is geographically concentrated. Out of all Chinese API manufacturers, more than 40% of those registered with the U.S. and Japan respectively are in Shanghai, Zhejiang and Jiangsu. With China sticking to its zero-tolerance approach to fighting the coronavirus, there are nagging worries in the industry about the potential impact of sudden lockdowns. In fact, the lockdown happened around Shanghai in March 2022 caused shipping delays and freight increase, according to Fujikawa.

This is no longer just an economic or business problem..

A supply chain review released by the White House in June 2021 highlighted the risk of pharmaceutical dependency, saying “the supply of drugs and the health of American citizens dependent upon these drugs are vulnerable to the geopolitical strategies of foreign governments.”

“There is definitely a national security risk,” said Reji K. Joseph, associate professor at the Institute for Studies in Industrial Development in India. Joseph pointed to penicillin, a widely used antibiotic, saying, “What would happen if supplies [of raw materials] from China stopped? We do not have a manufacturing facility here [in India], and it is not easy to find another supply source because everyone is dependent on China.”

China is deeply embedded in production of medical supplies used to treat COVID-19 as well, experts say.

“Sedatives, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories [and] medicines to treat life-threatening low blood pressure are among the generic medicines used to care for people with severe coronavirus. China produces 90% of the chemical ingredients for these essential medicines,” the Hastings Center’s Gibson told the U.S. Senate in March 2020.

According to analytics company Clarivate, out of 52 COVID-related treatments, three-fourths did not have API manufacturing sites within the U.S. at all.

Beijing is aware of the importance of having local API production, which is “not only about lowering the development and manufacturing cost” but also securing supplies from upstream, said Jens Ewert, who oversees China life sciences and health care at Deloitte.

Ewert said this applies to COVID-19 vaccines as well. “One of the key elements for the speedy development of the COVID-19 vaccine in China is that local pharma companies have very direct access to APIs while many other countries have to wait for the imports.”



Shanghai-based biotech company StemiRNA is developing its own mRNA vaccine whose ingredients are mostly locally supplied.
Source: AP/FeatureChina

While China initially focused on conventional vaccines, it is moving toward mRNA options like the ones provided by Pfizer and Moderna. Chinese biotech company StemiRNA Therapeutics says that 90% of the raw materials in its mRNA vaccine are supplied locally. The company is currently conducting global clinical trials, and says it is ready to produce 400 million doses annually.

When it comes to the new drugs for COVID-19, “it would surprise me if they were mass manufactured for global markets without any raw materials from China,” said Rory Horner, a senior lecturer at the University of Manchester.

A sharp political turnFrom the U.S. and European Union to India and Japan, governments are increasingly seeking ways to secure greater supply chain independence.

India is pushing particularly hard. In March 2020, the government revealed a plan to encourage domestic production of bulk pharmaceutical products such as APIs and KSMs, including a Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme worth 69.4 billion rupees ($900 million). The PLI program guarantees money for approved manufacturers of 53 important API, KSM and intermediate products for which India has a high dependency on China.

“This scheme is a very important initiative to reduce import dependence for critical APIs and will also help kick-start the API ecosystem,” said Sumit Goel, managing partner at India-based consulting firm Praxis Global Alliance.

India has become more dependent on China for APIs
China’s share of API imports by volume (in percent)



Note: No data for 2017
Source: UN Comtrade

The idea is to incentivize production in India enough to lower prices and become more competitive with imported APIs. Goel added that “while India, too, has strong API capabilities in certain segments, Chinese players had developed an advantage due to scale and favorable regulatory policies.”

China, meanwhile, is looking to improve its own industry. In some ways, it is undergoing a similar evolution to that seen in the West, paying more attention to environmental concerns. But while some companies are being squeezed out of the market, observers see the reforms leading not to a hollowing-out of the Chinese API sector, but to even greater strength.

China’s API industry undergoes shakeouts
Number of API producers and drugmakers



Source: National Medical Products Administration

Since around 2015, the government has emphasized quality control and cleaner production methods. This appears to have triggered a shakeout: The number of API manufacturers and drugmakers decreased from 5,065 in 2015 to 4,176 in 2016.

China’s 2015 Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution specified API production as one of 10 key industries in need of “a clean transformation.” The environmental law imposed the same year, billed as the strictest so far, and a 2016 environmental protection tax on producers of polluting substances, impacted the industry as well.

The ripples have been felt outside China.

When Anhui Bayi Chemical -- which produced nitrochlorobenzene, a key ingredient for the painkiller paracetamol -- was forced to shut down its facility due to environmental concerns in late 2020, it caused a sharp increase in the price of the paracetamol API. It was yet another example of the world’s high dependency on China for raw materials.

Over the years, China has been criticized for substandard APIs, such as contaminated heparin, a blood-thinning drug linked to at least 81 deaths in the U.S. in 2008, according to Reuters. But Beijing is apparently trying to raise the bar.

An evaluation system implemented in 2015 checks generic drugs’ consistency with branded versions. Drugmakers must pass this test to apply to a centralized purchasing policy, called the Volume Based Procurement (VBP). In the VBP, the government opens bids for the centralized procurement of drugs, mainly generic ones.

Nicolas Zhu, head of the life sciences and health care sector group at law firm CMS China, said that “due to the VBP, it would be hard for the pharmaceutical manufacturers to change the API suppliers, and [they] will pay more attention to the quality of the APIs.”

The government is also encouraging the production of patented APIs. China’s current market share of patented APIs is only 9%, while the U.S. accounts for 36%, according to Deloitte.

“Along with the government incentives in encouraging Chinese API manufacturers to shift from developing traditional APIs to high-end and patented APIs, we believe that the API types that China has an advantage with is expanding,” Deloitte’s Ewert said. “The presence of China in the global API supply chain will have a further boost in the upcoming years.”

The University of Manchester’s Horner said that China already has the “the ability and capability to work with innovative APIs, because once a drug maker spends billions of dollars and invents a new drug, it is actually very simple afterward to replicate.”

“The challenge for China,” he added, “is how to invent new APIs and bring them to the market.”

Achieving that would allow it to contribute more to global health -- and continue to expand its power over the supply chain.

No turning back

The result is that some countries are making promises about supply chain reshoring that they may find hard to keep.



French Prime Minister Jean Castex visits a chemical factory in Roussillon, in southeastern France, in September 2021.
Source: SEQENS

France’s much-heralded reopening of a shuttered paracetamol plant exemplifies a move that is less substantial than it seems.

The government announced in June 2020 that France would bring back domestic paracetamol API production, which had stopped in 2008. But paracetamol is a cheap drug, with a packet of 8 tablets typically sold in French pharmacies for about $3. Pro Generika’s Bretthauer warned: “Reshoring can be sustainable, but only if the selling prices paid for these products are maintainable on that higher level. Only then can producers of medicines afford to buy the more expensive European production instead of buying on the world market for lower prices.”

In India, several APIs are not covered by the production incentive scheme. Joseph at the Institute for Studies in Industrial Development suggested this is because they are simply “not profitable” for companies, since it can cost more to produce those APIs in India than to import from China.

“Any policy aimed at self-sufficient APIs and decreasing imports from China should focus on being able to produce in a price-competitive way,” he argued.

Flora Zhu, director of corporate research at Fitch Ratings, suggested that despite the talk of reshoring, the tide is not turning against China.

“We believe the scale of the production reshoring is limited at this stage and global pharmaceutical companies still procure a large portion of APIs from China, given China’s significant cost advantages,” she said.

How, then, can the world diversify the pharmaceutical supply chain and ensure drugs do not become a geopolitical bargaining chip?

Many experts are concerned that there is too much price pressure on drugmakers.

“You would not go to the grocery store and just say, ‘I always buy the cheapest no matter what the quality is,’” said Steffen Denzinger, president at the European Fine Chemicals Group (EFCG). “Is it fresh? Does it look like it was laying around for 20 days?”

The current system, Denzinger argued, can reward substandard products. “Additional criteria such as the security of supply or the respect of minimum social or environmental standards must be taken into consideration for public procurement.”

Investment in technology will be vital if others are to compete with China as well as conform to costly environmental rules. Efficient production can also lower the price of drug raw materials.

“In order to build competitiveness, it is crucial to invest consistently in technology and build on the scale. Efficiency comes from either scale or efficient process,” said Sudarshan Jain, secretary general of the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance, an industry body.

Jain added that India’s "National Institutes of Pharmaceuticals Education and Research (NIPER), scientific institutions and companies are working on improved processes to provide cost-efficient options.”

Gibson suggested there may be another way to trim costs – reconsidering the role of “middlemen,” such as distributors or purchasing organizations. She said they can account for a substantial portion of a generic drug’s price. This, she said, shows that the cost of manufacturing is often not the problem.

“With advanced technology, there are many drugs that can be produced faster, cheaper and with a smaller environmental footprint,” she said.

The pandemic has made countries acutely aware of the pharmaceutical supply chain’s fragility, and of how they have unconsciously handed China a major competitive advantage. The shift of basic drug production to China looks largely irreversible. The question is how to adjust and guarantee supplies of vital medicines, including in the next pandemic many health experts fear.

Medicines for Europe’s van den Hoven stressed that there should be a way to build a more balanced supply chain with the right policies and incentives on pricing and investment.

“With good policies, Europe can be competitive -- we can compete with India and China,” he said. “We are not asking to go to the moon.”

China’s global vaccine gambit
This is a series exploring China’s vaccine strategy, capabilities and role in the global health supply chain — and how it fits into preparations for the next pandemic.



01,

Production, politics and propaganda



02,

Pharmacy of the world



03,

The great medicines migration




To: carranza2 who wrote (200019)7/12/2023 10:27:46 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218134
 
Re <<There>>

… is a disturbance in the Force Message 34348604

kitco.com