To: John Gibbons who wrote (1696 ) 2/14/1998 5:36:00 PM From: Gutterball Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6464
Sarg, I think that's what I'll call you, because you busted in by accident shouting orders. I'm hurt you have not taken the time to read all my posts. I'm not here to flame people, maybe belittle when needed to get them to think about what they are saying, but unlike some I welcome both sides of the argument. Guess you have not read the thread. I've read most of it. Your post looks like you came here to gloat, but I won't flame you for adding tuppence to the pot. Besides, if I wanted flame broiled, I'd invite herb back to serve you up. He is much more articulate, and I might add funnier, than I. You say you want to make intelligent decisions about your investment. Well, I try to help people do that, like it or not! Technology isn't the issue with BAT. The critical issue in play is the SEC investigation -- which ole Joe would have you believe is routine. A lesser issue, until the SEC is satisfied, is BAT's dyno test for Ford. And of course, there is a broader issue which any one with great lateral vision already knows, is Joe the right man to lead the company. Heaven forbid I said that, but an intelligent man like yourself must have already asked yourself that question. After all, Joe has brought us this far, pulse technology and the SEC. If Joe goes to jail, as he says he's prepared to do, and takes his secrets with him, pulse technology may never see the light of day. That ought to be an environmentalist worst nightmare. There is no downside here for Joe, if he goes to jail, he can always get date Susan McDougall. Sarg, it helps get the point across if you salt your comments with wit --so lighten up). To show you that I am a nice guy, I make a peace offering of the key to the front door to the BAT Chat room. Maybe you can catch ole Joe and you can both talk about old times, the war or something. Dazzle each other with brilliance and all that.ssys.net