SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Clarke who wrote (3230)2/14/1998 6:56:00 PM
From: jeffbas  Respond to of 78602
 
I generally disagree with you on AOL. I was patient with them in the winter a year ago. But when the service started turning bad again recently, I bagged it for the cable modem @HOME service.

I had no problem changing my email address and I value my time.
@HOME is so many times faster I can't possibly imagine how I could have wasted so many hours on AOL. The cost difference in immaterial for anyone who needs an extra phone line for AOL, to avoid tieing up the primary home line for long periods.

I think AOL is at the current price because of momentum players, short
squeezes, stupid investors, AND because it does have a franchise. (You
can have a franchise without offering the best product or service in town.) However, the stock is grossly overpriced - but you sell short a bad business not a bad stock, which too many shorts never learn.



To: James Clarke who wrote (3230)2/14/1998 7:01:00 PM
From: Wallace Rivers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78602
 
I guess I have never had the need or desire to use AOL. My 15 bucks/month gets me 90 hours without AOL's bells and whistles - don't need or want them.
Though I will agree with you that there are not unlimited barriers to entry, this certainly is not the one way toll bridge our friend Mr. Buffett looks for. And, at 100+ times earnings, this stock is ridiculously overVALUEd.