Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Da_cheifs vomitorium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mongo2116 who wrote (6973)	7/22/2023 10:24:38 PM
From: #Breeze	3 Recommendations Recommended By DD™ Mongo2116 rdkflorida2 Respond to of 7554

Mongo, I've modeled a progression of his latest wave count. And when I post it everyone will see the ridiculousness of his revised bearish wave count. He relies on folks lack of understanding of Elliott Wave which is why he gets away with posting such charts without being called out. Breeze

To: Mongo2116 who wrote (6973)	7/22/2023 11:02:41 PM
From: #Breeze	2 Recommendations Recommended By DD™ rdkflorida2 Respond to of 7554

Mongo, PS is now aware that his ABC wave bearish count is a bust. So, on Friday he posted a revised bearish wave count. I’ve modeled the progression of his wave count to its conclusion of a price for Super Cycle (II). And that price is 282.82. Not a typo. This his most absurd wave count to date. He posits that Cycle Waves [1} and [2] are complete and Cycle Wave [3] is in play. I’ve modeled the price for Cycle Waves [3], [4] and [5] and that would conclude Cycle Wave [A] at price of 1782. Then a Cycle Wave would retrace 50% of the Cycle [A] decline to a price of 3297.81. Thereafter, a Cycle Wave [C] decline (whose magnitude would equal Cycle [A]) will conclude at a price of 282.82 to conclude Super Cycle (II). Here's that modeled wave count. tradingview.com