SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Russia Hoax -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (5)7/27/2023 10:55:39 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16
 
Russia offered Carter Page a huge stake in Russia's state oil company

The oil story was completely phony. It was fabricated by Fusion GPS (Clinton campaign). It was based on the true story that Page traveled to Moscow and mingled with Russians. But he wasn't working for Russia. He was working for the CIA. The FBI knew this but falsely claimed to be suspicious of his actions.


The FBI got a Title I FISA warrant targeting Page. This warrant allowed them to spy on Trump and everyone around him.

FISA’s License to Hop:

How the FISA warrant on Carter Page enabled Obama Administration surveillance of the entire Trump team, and why civil libertarians should be worried

tabletmag.com



That FISA warrant relied entirely on the Steele Dossier (which was a complete fabrication).

In an astonishing admission, the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz conceded to lawmakers Wednesday that the FBI’s FISA applications used to continue surveillance on the 2016 Trump campaign were based entirely on sources for the widely discredited Steele Dossier funded by the Democrats.

“The FISA applications relied entirely on information from the Steele… from the primary sub-source’s reporting to support the allegation that Page was coordinating with the Russian government on 2016 U.S. presidential election activities.” Horowitz said.
thefederalist.com

The FISA warrants contained 35 claims with zero supporting documentation, documentation that didn't support the claims, or documentation that DIRECTLY REFUTED the claims.

twitter.com

The FBI knew Carter Page was an undercover CIA agent, but they feigned ignorance so they could pretend his travel to Russia was suspicious. Page requested an FBI interview, but they refused.
On August 17, 2016, Comey received information from the CIA establishing that Dr. Page was an “operational contact” for the CIA during the period of 2008 -2013.

On September 7, 2016, the CIA sent an investigation referral to Defendant Comey and Defendant Strzok regarding "U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's approval of a plan concerning U.S.Presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private mail server."

Thus, Defendant Comey was expressly warned and aware of the political agenda driving the claims against Dr. Page at a very early stage. He was similarly well aware of Dr. Page’s status as a CIA contact, yet he chose to move forward with an investigation that he knew was based on a political distraction campaign during a hotly contested election against an innocent American citizen.

Next, on September 25, 2016, Dr. Page sent Defendant Comey a letter denying he had had communications with any sanctioned Russian officials. Dr. Page stated in the letter that he had a decades’ long record of interactions with the CIA and FBI. This was consistent with the prior CIA reports provided to the FBI involving Dr. Page, which established that he had such a record. It is clear that Defendant Comey received this letter, as he distributed it to the Crossfire Hurricane team, including its supervisor, Defendant Strzok.

By the end of September, probably no later than the third week of that month, Defendant Comey learned of the existence of the Steele dossier. Defendant Comey understood at that time that the dossier was funded by political opposition to Presidential candidate Donald Trump and knew that Dr. Page’s letter of denial was a response to those unfounded accusations.

This was exactly the political tactic he had been warned about by the CIA about several weeks earlier. Yet Defendant Comey approved use of the dossier anyway.

storage.courtlistener.com

Tom



To: Thomas M. who wrote (5)7/27/2023 12:09:35 PM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16
 
The familiar pattern: The "Russian" wants to meet with a Trump official, but the day before that he meets with a Deep State agent. Deep State arranging the trap?
  • May 6, 2016 - Kilimnik meets with Secretary of State John Kerry's chief of staff Jonathan Finer
  • May 7, 2016 - Kilimnik meets with Manafort

p68/69 (82/83 on the pdf) intelligence.senate.gov

Imagine if Kilimnik actually was a Russian spy.
  • Finer has access to lots of national security info. He meets a Russian spy. No alarm bells.
  • Manafort has access to zero national security info. He meets a Russian spy. Alarm bells ringing like crazy.
That's exactly backwards of how it should be.

Tom