Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (892)	2/15/1998 3:14:00 AM
From: Just My Opinion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6528

Tidegilder: Tell everyone how many shares you have in this company. I feel that it is important that eveyone know why you are so interested in what happens here. I have 50,000 shares.. I hide nothing. cool, huh? why are you here????? stop stalking. al

To: TideGlider who wrote (892)	2/15/1998 9:53:00 AM
From: Angel D	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6528

TG, Thanks for backing me up on this one. As you stated, the thread is a place where information can be exchanged and, as you said, s martin has apparently run into a wall or a void of information. Therefore, he has nothing to share. Also, as you stated, I think we all recognize that his questions are "rhetorical". To my way of thinking, "rhetorical" questions are those for which the answer is obvious or for which no answer is necessary or even available. They are asked just for the sake of asking. Since, as you said, he continues to ask rhetorical questions, it only demonstrates further that he is certainly not doing DD or seeking information. It would appear, therefore, that he asks the questions either to harass or, at the very least, to plant seeds of doubt in the minds of investors, both current and future. With no stated position in the stock, why would he be doing this? (Oh, without intending to, it would appear that this is an example of a rhetorical question.) I'm surprised, but pleased, at your objectivity and willingness to assist me in pointing out s martin's real purpose here. Regards, AD