SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (200657)8/6/2023 12:49:06 PM
From: marcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217542
 
at ~19:00 mcnamara says she is directed by the "standards of care" (and not a systematic review of research).
so, gotta wonder how the "standards of care" are developed and why they do not require verification by systematic research review...

medical standards of care:

"... In the late 1980s the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research called for improvements in healthcare
delivery... In the wake of these changes, professional medical societies, governments, and insurers in turn
created their own guidelines.

... Another problem is a lack of scientific evidence to back the stated guidelines. As well as conflicting
information, there is the problem of biased guidelines emanating from private health insurance
companies and the like.

"...While there is no standard definition for the meaning of ‘standard-of-care’ per se, a medical definition of
what is meant by the term is given as follows (Stöppler, 2021).
1. A diagnostic and treatment process that a clinician should follow for a certain type of patient, illness, or
clinical circumstance.
2. In legal terms, the level at which the average, prudent provider in a community would practice; how similarly
qualified practitioners would have managed the patient's care under the same or similar circumstances.
news-medical.net

the above article indicates medical standards of care are developed by medical societies, governments,
and insurers. thus, medical folks appear to be outnumbered by politics and profiteers. golly, no research (really)
required. just go-along-get-along and make lots of money. easy peasy.................

ama from 2004:
journalofethics.ama-assn.org