SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1414088)8/10/2023 6:02:35 PM
From: Doren1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579983
 
> You claimed that Kyle Rittenhouse shouldn't have been out there in the first place, and you used that as justification for convicting him of manslaughter.

No I didn't. I would justify convicting him of manslaughter because he could have used pepper spray. Instead the stupid fool used a deadly weapon.

Incompetent. Killing a person by accident or incompetence is manslaughter.

> The first guy that Kyle shot, jOjO (according to The Woke Hulk, Mark Ruffalo), had an extensive violent criminal record

That's vigilantism. Kyle is not a cop or judge to make that determination. He doesn't have that authority. You can't just shoot a person because they have a record.

Bottom line, Kyle is an assssss hole self appointed vigilante who went looking for trouble. Other families paid for his stupidity. Whether he "meant well" is immaterial. Same as whether BLM people mean well.

>> So when you lump me in with BLM you are WRONG WRONG WRONG ... AGAIN.

>The whole riot was associated with BLM.

CAN YOU READ? I'm not in favor of BLM... once again you put words in my mouth. You have no idea how to debate in a civilized manner. Its not civilized to put false words in the other debaters mouth. Sheech.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1414088)8/10/2023 6:33:26 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1579983
 
you used that as justification for convicting him of manslaughter. He should've been convicted of manslaughter because he killed two unarmed people.

None of them attacked Crybaby Kyle. He attacked them. Just goes to show juries don't always get it right.