SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jamie153 who wrote (1414386)8/14/2023 12:35:33 AM
From: Maple MAGA   Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578289
 
Never talk to cops... everyone knows that...




To: Jamie153 who wrote (1414386)8/14/2023 12:36:14 AM
From: Maple MAGA 1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578289
 
Ex-Orange County Democratic Party leader pleads guilty in bribery scheme

The longtime local leader admitted she tried to bribe two Irvine City Council members to help her clients open a cannabis store in the city.

EDVARD PETTERSSON / April 14, 2023



Melahat Rafiei, the former executive director of the Democratic Party in Orange County, California, in a Sept. 2021 Facebook post (Facebook via Courthouse News).

LOS ANGELES (CN) — The former executive director of the Democratic Party of Orange County, California, pleaded guilty Friday to attempted wire fraud as part of a broader bribery investigation.

Melahat Rafiei, 45, admitted that in 2018 she offered to help two clients of her consulting business, who were in the medical marijuana industry, to bribe two members of the Irvine City Council so that they would introduce and vote for an ordinance allowing her clients to open a retail cannabis store in the Southern California city.

In a separate scheme, she admitted that in 2019 she asked one of the same clients for $300,000 to help pass a cannabis-related ordinance in Anaheim even though she was already getting paid by other clients to do this. She also admitted that she lied to this client that she'd only take $10,000 of the $300,000 as her payment. She in fact intended to keep $100,000 of the money.

"I understand, your honor," a tearful Rafiei told U.S. District Judge Fernando Aenlle-Rocha when asked whether she understood the civic rights she was giving up, including the right to hold office, by pleading guilty to a felony.

Aennle-Rocha set a sentencing date for Oct. 13.

Rafiei was a longtime leader in Orange County’s Democratic Party and has served as secretary of the California Democratic Party and as state representative to the Democratic National Committee. She ran a Long Beach political consulting firm, Progressive Solutions Consulting, during the time she got involved in the bribery scheme.

According to her plea agreement, Rafiei agreed to pay at least $225,000 in bribes to the two unidentified Irvine City Council members. The payments were to be disguised as attorneys fees she was paying them for legal services they provided for her various public affairs and campaign management companies to circumvent the elected officials’ disclosure requirements.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Melissa Sedrish Rabbani declined to comment after Friday's hearing on whether the U.S. was bringing any charges against the Irvine politicians. A spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in LA clarified that the investigation was ongoing.

In the 2019 scheme, she lied to her client that $200,000 of the $300,000 payment would go to the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. She admitted that she intended to split the $200,000 with an associate of hers who was not affiliated with the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. She instructed the client to pay the $300,000 to various entities whose accounts she controlled.

Unbeknownst to Rafiei, the two medical marijuana entrepreneurs she was dealing with turned out to be FBI informants.

She faces a maximum of 20 years in prison for the attempted wire fraud conviction but the actual sentence will likely be a lot less. The prosecution agreed as part of her plea deal that they'd recommend a sentence at the low end of the guidelines, which could add up to around 21 months.



To: Jamie153 who wrote (1414386)8/14/2023 1:20:59 AM
From: pocotrader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578289
 
I once had cops follow me home. I was on the property and a cop said to me, this is where you live? I replied yes then they drove away. the only thing i could think of maybe they wanted to give me a speeding ticket



To: Jamie153 who wrote (1414386)8/28/2023 11:55:38 PM
From: Maple MAGA 1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578289
 
The Western World Is About To Deliver Some Very Bad News To Its Young Adults

BY TYLER DURDEN

MONDAY, AUG 28, 2023 - 05:40 PM

By Benjamin Picton, Senior Macro Strategist at Rabobank

Here Be DragonsI’ve been away on holiday for the last two weeks trying my best to pay more attention to my children than I do to the markets. Mission accomplished for the most part, but it has been hard to look away while momentous shifts seem to be occurring all around us. Indeed, at the Jackson Hole symposium over the weekend, ECB President Lagarde re-upped her comments from April by suggesting that “there are plausible scenarios where we could see a fundamental change in the nature of economic interactions”, “past regularities may no longer be a good guide for how the economy works” and “there is no pre-existing playbook for the situation we are facing.” Translation: “we really don’t know if rates are high enough or not, and that isn’t really the point anyway.”

So, according the second most senior central banker in the world we’re in uncharted waters, and as anyone who has ever taken an interest in the Age of Discovery will know, once you reach the edge of the known world, here be dragons.

The most obvious dragon is of course China, and its surrogates, which are making new attempts at formalizing challenger status to the G7 via the BRICS bloc. Michael Every notes:

The BRICS just expanded to allow in Argentina, Ethiopia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iran, so with much hullabaloo we can colour in more countries, GDPs and commodities (like oil) as 'anti-dollar'. However, Argentina is a serial defaulter with a plummeting currency, and may dollarize soon; Ethiopia is one of the world's poorest countries, and recently brushed with civil war; Egypt has a wilting currency; Saudi Arabia and the UAE have their currencies pegged to the US dollar, and the former is haggling over a US defence deal and nuclear tech; and Iran is heavily sanctioned, again with a collapsing currency, and could be daggers drawn again with Saudi at any time. In short, the world is changing, but as the FT has pointed out, the BRICS+ (a name created by Goldman Sachs) don't even have an official website. Meanwhile, it was the Euro, not the dollar, that saw its share of SWIFT transactions collapse to a record low in the latest data. You want to look at potential early victims of any global tectonic shifts? Look there.

This reads as a very ragtag group, with “relationships” built mainly around a common outsider status and no small dose of opportunism in seizing a perceived first-mover advantage in undermining dollar hegemony. We remain sceptical. As we’ve covered in this publication many times, the idea of commodity standard like some kind of petro-Yuan is laden with problems.

The auspices aren’t great for the new alternative multilateralism. The putative centre of the BRICS+ bloc, China, is struggling to revive its flagging growth engine while economic remedies that are taken as orthodox in the West are shunned for their perceived incompatibility with Xi Xinping thought. Markets have been waiting for months for signs of big-bang stimulus from the CCP or the PBOC, but as the WSJ reports, maybe it just ain’t coming. Chinese perceptions that Western consumerism is flabby, decadent and morally obtuse stands at odds with the need for China to fulfil the role of deficit-runner in order to get enough Yuan into the hands of the periphery. How can Argentina, Brazil, Iran and Egypt buy virtuous Chinese manufactures if they don’t have any Yuan? The answer here is that trade will continue to be conducted in dollars, one way or another.

China clearly has little appetite for further credit expansion either. The CCP has made several attempts over the years to rein-in debt levels, all of which have ultimately been abandoned in the face of a stalling economy. For the time being, Xi Xinping is resisting large-scale easing of credit conditions, urging “patience” while the economy passes through what policy-makers hope is a temporary soft patch, rather than the start of a Japan-style stagnation brought on by decades of malinvestment and speculative pump-priming of real estate assets.

The real question now is how strong the CCP and the PBOCs resolve to address burgeoning debt-levels will be in the face of economic slowdown. For an authoritarian regime whose legitimacy is built on the delivery of rapidly rising living standards, slow growth poses a potentially existential risk. The obvious retort here is that authoritarian states have no need to court popular opinion, but the speed at which the Covid-Zero policy was ultimately abandoned in the face of civil discontent should serve as an indication that the CCP is ultimately still sensitive to what the population thinks.

Looking back to Jackson Hole it’s fair to say that debt and popular discontent aren’t a uniquely Chinese problem. During the meeting of rich men north of Richmond (Jackson Hole is north of Richmond, I checked) a paper presented by Barry Eichengreen and Serkan Arslanap broke the bad news that “public debts will not decline significantly for the foreseeable future”, “primary surpluses of... 3 to 5 percent of GDP are very much exceptions to the rule” and that “inflation is not a sustainable route to reducing high public debts.” That all makes for sobering reading for already beleaguered millennials and Gen Z’s, who will be the can carriers for Eichengreen and Arslanap’s prognosis that “given ageing populations, governments will have to find additional finance for healthcare and pensions”.



What seems to be missing here is a dose of Huw Pill cod liver oil, whereby the West confronts the idea that we’re not as rich as we used to be, and that deteriorating demographics and higher spends on national security might necessitate a lowering of ambitions around what is possible in welfare economics. There are signs that the message is starting to get through. BOJ Governor Ueda nodded to the plight of the West when he suggested that the relocation of supply chains will result in lower productivity in the future, which ultimately means lower real incomes. Meanwhile, former French Ambassador to the United States Gerard Araud, echoes Michael Every’s assessment of Europe’s diminishing importance by writing in the UK Telegraph that “ deluded Europe can’t see that it is finished.”

Nobody likes bad news, but telling young people that they need to pay a higher proportion of their stagnant incomes to fund the pensions of people who are wealthier than they are ever likely to be is sure to go down like a lead balloon, especially when pop culture is already communicating the sense that a Dollar doesn’t buy what it used to, and is taxed to the hilt.

So, the plates are shifting and policy makers in the West seem to be either totally unsure of the answers, or proffering answers that are anathema to the social fabric. We’re in uncharted territory and here be dragons.



To: Jamie153 who wrote (1414386)8/28/2023 11:57:51 PM
From: Maple MAGA   Respond to of 1578289