Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew Q. Viet who wrote (1564)	2/15/1998 1:33:00 PM
From: Mr. Pink	Respond to of 7054

I have better things to do on a Sunday afternoon than participate in this idiotic discussion but Mr. Pink must defend His name. It is true that He accused CLCX management of being crims and that the stock subsequently rose. DNA stock rose before crashing as did IDID and a number of other frauds. Need I remind Mr. VIET that Mr. Pink also warned investors off of MEDA in the teens before it crashed to 4, SYES at 6 before dropping 66% to 2 and FONX at 8 chopped down 75% to 2. Viet you, really need to get a life. Go outside and breathe some fresh air. Visit a friend, if you have any. Read a book. You really need to get a life. Mr. Pink says this as your friend. Enjoy your sabatical. It will do you good. When you return, ACRT should be in single digits. By the way, that was another Mr. Pink on the AOL thread. Also be careful before taking the advice of retail brokers at obscure firms sometimes referred to as "bucket shops". Be even more careful in quoting them, it makes you look all the more ridiculous. Mr. Pink

To: Andrew Q. Viet who wrote (1564)	2/15/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: Doo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7054

Andrew Q.: I'll take my leave as well. As I've said repeatedly, I don't think Mr. Pink, or even 10 Mr. Pinks, can damage a stock with a float of over 4 million shares on boards like these. Readers are too small in number and buying/selling power no matter how many there are. My point was, and is, that the only verifiable fact in this entire mess is the chart. The stock has tanked, and until it makes a sustained move above it's 200 day moving average on volume comparable to that we've seen on the down side, it will stay in the tank.... As far as Mr. Pink's information, I'd remain cautious about casting it all aside. It may be delivered with a tone that raises suspiscion, but this company should be viewed with suspiscion, in my opinion, for the reasons I've provided before. Granted, I've not done the leg work on this stock to verify the accuracy of the claims made by Pink and others, but this stock has a very familiar smell about it, to me. Painful memories of penny stocks and hype scams in my past... Regards Jeffry