SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jan Crawley who wrote (34918)2/15/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
By Emmy Kondo
ABCNEWS.com
Despite peaceful and prosperous times, many
American business and government leaders are biting
their nails.
Last month's good news about unemployment -now at a
24-year low of 4.7 percent-leaves many large firms worried
that a lack of skilled labor will compromise future growth.
Can the American educational system produce workers
qualified to lead the global technological revolution? Are
today's kids ready to become tomorrow's Dilberts?
Historically, the United States has led the world in
scientific and technological advances-thanks in no small part
to Cold War defense budgets that allocated huge sums of
money to scientific education and research. Can anything
motivate the nation as strongly as the Red Menace once did?

Celebrities Tout Code
Perhaps: The government understands the bottom line when it
comes to funding priorities, and it's tackling the high-tech
labor crunch with zeal.
"This is of enormous importance," Commerce Secretary
William Daley said during a recent interview.
Last month, the Clinton Administration announced that it
will spend $28 million to retrain workers, create an Internet
jobs bazaar and try to convince kids that the computer sciences
are cool. The p.-r. blitz will include public service videos
starring Jimmy Smits, tough-guy star of the television cop
show NYPD Blue.

Code-Dependent Economy
The market competitiveness of everything from toasters to
medical devices is predicated on the quality of the trillions of
lines of codes jammed out by programmers, the assembly-line
workers of the 21st century. Programmers are increasingly
responsible for our quality of life: they make sure our
financial transactions, cars, planes, security systems, and
medical procedures function properly.
But 69 percent of companies surveyed say that "few" or
"some" applicants for information technology jobs possess the
skills required. And 68% cite a lack of skilled or trained
workers as a barrier to future growth, according to a study by
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and the Information Technology
Association of America, an industry trade group.
"The shortage is a fundamental threat to the economic
growth of the United States," says ITAA president Harris N.
Miller. "It's not just hurting the ability of classic computer
companies to grow. It's hurting the ability of the entire
economy to grow through productivity increases."

Future Schlock?
But many skeptics say the high-tech industries are sounding an
unnecessarily alarmist note.
"I feel this is a four-year bubble," says Scott Anderson, a
programmer and owner of Copan
Software. "By the year 2001 we are
going to begin seeing a glut. This
industry is a cyclical one of demand
and surplus."
Robert Lerman, a policy analyst at
the Urban Institute, suggests we're
seeing a young industry with its head
in the clouds, rather than a grave
national crisis. "Personnel people put
out unrealistic expectations," he said.
"And when they can't meet those
expectations, or can't find enough
people meeting those unrealistic
expectations, then they say there is a shortage."
Many argue that federal tax dollars should not be targeted
towards helping an already wealthy industry reap ever greater
profits.
"If you put it in perspective, the demand for skill in the
U.S. economy has been high across the board," says Lerman.
"College graduates are getting all kinds of jobs-including
these jobs-and this industry is having to compete in a broad
market which has been expanding for the more educated."

Incentives: Mostly Bells and Whistles?
Technology companies are notorious for the creative ways
they try to seduce new employees and salaries for new hires
with hot skills have skyrocketed in recent months.
But Anderson, a software-industry veteran, says that those
already-employed are not getting the equity raises they
deserve. "People are pleading for equity and going
unanswered. Companies are not willing to raise salaries
pre-emptively, and that's how you know there's not a true
shortage."
On closer inspection, many of the new incentives aren't big
bottom-line items like salaries, tuition reimbursements or
stock options, but cheap perks that make employees happy in
the day-to-day: flexible scheduling, casual dress codes,
one-time bonusess, and all the free soda and munchies they can
stomach.
Programmer Daniel Reinhurst says such carrots look better
than they taste, especially to twentysomething candidates.
"You hear these crazy stories about what people are
offering." he says. "But sure, some big company buys a bunch
of Snapple wholesale or puts up a basketball hoop. How much
does it really cost them? In exchange, you get people working
insane amounts of overtime who live at the office."