SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (200885)8/20/2023 10:26:21 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217749
 
Re <<China could easily supply them as they are currently unemployed>>

yes and no, possibly and perhaps

(1) I shall refrain from dumping on collective MSM on laughably skewed reporting on China

(2) I shall not mention the always-present deep-state

(3) I shall veer away from alerting to the agenda of the uni-party

(4) My opinion

a. China is a managed state

b. Manager is the CPC

c. The ‘mandate from heaven’ is with the CPC as long as the CPC is delivering

d. There are two governments in the world that are afraid of the people over which they rule, one is in Hong Kong and the other in Beijing

e. Chinese have much patience due to wisdom, and so the civilization is ancient, and given patience cut a lot of slack to the governance system and the governor

f. In HK we have a CEO (John Lee), useful at this juncture in unstable times

g. In China (mainland) they have Core Comrade, his name be Xi Jinping

h. Useful to delve into the history of Xi Jinping and I append some links Message 34324306

i. Fundamental question: does XI Jinping want to and has he done something good for his people? Answer, yes, for most of the people, perhaps because he cares

j. Re the the minutia of real estate this, unemployment that, banking something else, and even re demographics, question, here be the short answer –

i. Can go back 5,000 years but will not :0)

ii. China growth model 1850 – 1950, to survive near-continuous foreign invasions, encroachments, and persistent civil strife, warlordism, and civil war

iii. China growth model 1950 – 1980, political struggles over development policy, to the point of near-military coup, albeit China military is actually not an arm of the government but a function of the CPC political party. Disaster following wrong turns.

iv. China growth model 1980 – 2010, based on aggregation of capital, low-end manufacturing, export, based on mobilization of inexpensive labour, overlapped by …

v. China growth model 2000 – 2023, based on cheap capital, much of it aggregated domestically off of mobilization of savings, and inexpensive labour, and all-in on infrastructure construction (including housing)

vi. China growth model 2010 – 2023, based on value-packed intellectual capital that displaces some foreign investments, and expands outward from China

vii. China growth model going forward, based on desire for quality against quantity of GDP, more and affordable domestic consumption, and clean / sustainable domain. We are at the juncture of change.

viii. Given above narration, the comeuppance for the real estate developers is not bad but necessary albeit jarring pivot

ix. But, no, do not worry about China banking sector, for the sector is a public utility and not a sovereign state within a state, or hedge funds :0)

x. Given narration to this point, cheaper apartments are good, and in truth, cheaper everything okay

k. Pretty much all issues, including trade war, IP battle, governance campaigns, etc etc can be viewed following above preamble, and no, unlikely that Xi Jinping is a dictator, for he and family are accountable big time for a long time, and he knows it.

(5) On the flip side, opinion of another Message 34389402

Biden asked a question, and I believe an important one, and am pondering :0)))


we on Koh Samui Message 34384627 heard from David by remote, specifically on this below narrative take



am polling folks on this take Message 34389402




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (200885)8/21/2023 10:37:38 AM
From: ggersh1 Recommendation

Recommended By
dubad

  Respond to of 217749
 


The leaders of the CW are pure psychopaths. We are told those that
lead us are the best and brightest, going to Harvard, Rhodes Scholars,
Stanford, Yale, Berkley, but the reality is that corruption and having the
silver spoon in their mouth at birth has led us to where we are now.

It is evil personified that to this day they still hate Russians for what
happened to the Romanovs way back when. Putin has tried to work

with them ever since he took power but that isn't good enough for the
psychopaths, they want it all and appear to be going after it no matter
the consequences.

Remember Albright said the killing of over 500K Iraqi kids was worth it
so the killing fields all over the world is a nothingburger to those that lead
the CW. The Covid Plandemic is more proof of the evil residing in the CW


Trump will never sit in the Oval Office again mark my words on that. It
will take a revolution for that to ever happen. And besides he's one of them,
for he definitely strives to be in that club.




Do those people not have consciences?


The simple answer is NYET but we knew that long long ago.

Since the Americans want war, they could also get some experience in how to conduct military activity in Ukraine, and maybe Poland since the Poles seem keen on stoking more conflict. Finland too is keen to boost the war on Russia. Norway hosts Yank Tanks to Murmansk manoeuvres ready to roll. Ursula is the 4th Reich leader keen to finally conquer Russia. Strange that such evil people think they are the Good Guys. Their Triumph of the Will is just like the Good Old Days.


Remember this amerikkans are slow learners, Churchill was right about that. The Poles
have meant to lost over 10K in ukraine already, Norway and the Finns have lost their minds
and once a Nazi always a Nazi

From what I understand many original Nazi's were in charge of NATO
for quite sometime, you can't fix stupid can you?