Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1418092)	9/6/2023 4:20:47 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 PKRBKR Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579131

Wharfie, He was studying intensity of fires. It doesn't matter whether the fire was started by arson, a car, a bullet, a falling wire, a dragging chain, a cigarette butt, or lightning, it will be more intense. It does matter because his research is being used by the media to blame climate change for starting those fires. It also matters because he is not allowed to even bring up that point, no matter how irrelevant it may be. Finally it matters because the focus in research these days is getting published, not necessarily being accurate or being useful when it comes to discovering the truth. There is a vested interest in skewing reports, hiding "inconvenient facts," and omitting details not because they may or may not be irrelevant, but simply because they counter the narrative. The peer review process is supposed to filter this stuff out, but it's all too clear to me that the peer review process is in on the shenanigans. Tenchusatsu