To: Gutterball who wrote (1806 ) 2/16/1998 4:22:00 AM From: TheAlaskan Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 6464
BAAT Certainty vs. Uncertainty The uncertainties first: 1. SEC investigation and its effects on the short term, mid term and long term outlook on BAAT. The SEC investigation just may be negative in the short term and positive in the mid term if it helps BAAT get listed on the Nasdaq and or it gets them to release alleged positive financials. SEC violations will prompt sharehoders to fold. 2. BAAT may or may not have letters of intent or contracts pending with major players. 3. BAAT technology may or may not be farther advanced than what the Big three or what the Japanese are working on. 4. BAAT management might be able to develop technologies, but may or may not be prepared to effectively deal with major automobile and other engine manufacturers in negotiating licensing agreements. The certainties 1. BAAT has developed and marketed Zinc-air batteries. 2. Developed a pulse engine that delivered 95 mpg to a world audience travelling at 40mph on a unpatented technology. 3. Baat is hosted by Lockheed Martin to European customers, one of which is Skoda Elcar, a diversified Czech concern that has ties to VW. 4. BAAT share prices are being manipulated that is certain. The uncertainty is who is it? MM's, the company or by other interests such as competitors or by companies that would like to buy BAAT Technology through ownership as opposed to negotiation? hard to say. 5. BAAT has been subpeoned to turn over information on 46 items. The IF's If BAAT technology on the pulse engine is real; If it can be outfitted on all internal combustion engines and not shorten engine life; If it can be patented; and if it can be deployed at a price that is economically feasible, then the SEC, stock manipulations, management mishandling of the media will pale in perspective. Someone will buy the technology and use it. If all of the IF's become a reality then this little company will be here for a very long while and will be able to enrich its current investors. If any of the above cannot be accomplished or fail to materialize, then this company will not change the world as many think that it has the potential to do and it will continue to be a low dollar stock. It's a classic case of risk vs. reward. high risk equals high payoff. On a side note, it appears that one of BAAt's subsidiaries is Environmental Resources, Inc. an environmentalist lobbying company. If BAAT was a scam, I do not think that they would be lobbying Congress or California for tax credits on super efficient vehicles or for sales tax rebates in California for cars that get over 65 mpg. Can anyone tell me additional information on this subsidiary? I am particularly interested in knowing if the subsidiary has testified for higher CAFE, and gas guzzler legislation which has been opposed by the Big Three? The reason I ask is that at least one poster on this board works indirectly for Ford. Individuals on other boards work for BAAT competitors. I enjoy reading posts from to investors and those offering investment advice. I do not however, like to be manipulated into decision making situations with advice from hired guns. The Alaskan