SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PCTH Anyone think this can take off in 1998?!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ed doell who wrote (1148)2/16/1998 12:44:00 PM
From: mr. ed  Respond to of 1509
 
I think $8.00 will take some time. i have follow this post for 7 mounths and 5 mounths ago alot of people thought we would be at $8 then. So we will eventually get there.

regards mr ed



To: ed doell who wrote (1148)2/16/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: Len  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1509
 
Lookinig at the chart, if PCTH is in play, $8 short term is not unreasonable. It hit a triple bottom at 4.25 and now seems to be running up on strong volume - maybe the shorts are feeling a squeeze.

Len



To: ed doell who wrote (1148)2/16/1998 10:48:00 PM
From: Murat  Respond to of 1509
 
Hi ed
I agree some of your thought but I think you are forgeting volume of this stocks . Average daily volume was up to last week 650.000 than last week more than 4.000.000 dont you you think some people are became extremly bullish.I think people who bought the stock around $3 are out from this point and on if the volume stays above 500.000 and up stock will hit $ 8 in 4 weeks.Stocks has been heavily promoted since last week. I will call my broker tomorrow to try to get more info.



To: ed doell who wrote (1148)2/17/1998 4:20:00 PM
From: LarryStk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1509
 
Ed

Has your broker told you there might be an announcement of a contract today or tomorrow. I heard there should be a good announcement soon. With all the volume of last week I would have thought the stock would be much higher than here.
Larry