To: Bald Eagle who wrote (7605 ) 2/16/1998 3:09:00 PM From: JD Respond to of 116972
It seemed like a good thing at the time...... Looks like the U.S. plan could be a no-win situation. If they bomb they have to defend growing accusations of being a brutal world dictator in their own right and if they back down now they lose an incredible amount of face. Saddam is controlling the biggest weapon ... media spin. He will also not hesitate to sacrifice hundreds of thousands of his people to better his bargaining position. Like it or not, the U.S. is quickly getting painted into a corner and they, and the rest of the world, may not come out of this as easily as originally thought. IMVVVVHO, regardless of the final decision the fallout from this is not likely to promote continued exuberance on Wall Street and will reduce the likelihood that the world will accept the $US as the long term global monetary standard. Will the herd come running back to gold??? 1. OPPOSITION TO BOMBING IRAQ GROWSnewsday.com "Some insist the bombing wouldn't go far enough," "Others fear a U.S. attack would go too far, killing thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians, " "support wavered last week, with Republicans and Democrats raising questions about what an airstrike could accomplish" 2. IRAQ ISSUES WARNING TO KUWAITnewsday.com "'We hope they won't commit this deadly mistake." "Several hard-line Russian lawmakers visiting Iraq, meanwhile, plan to stay there as a ''human shield'' against possible U.S. strikes." " Israel's military, which drew up plans to kill Saddam in 1991, is again considering proposals to assassinate him, this time with a precision bombing raid," "In London, peace campaigners swarmed around an air base that would direct British strikes against Iraq,"