SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David A. Irvine who wrote (3315)2/16/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: Redhead  Respond to of 27968
 
Dave,

Post 3316 Good post. Welcome aboard.

Wayne J. Post 3314 Good post. I agree.

Just to let everyone know I am still patiently waiting under that umbrella for the financials and news. For anyone who does not have enough patience at this point, then I suggest you remember Rome was not built in one day. Some things just take time, and no matter what you do, you can't move them. We will know soon enough whether we keep or sell the stock. Just sit back, watch, wait and enjoy life. It will all come soon enough. I think I will have a cup of tea now and let you all go back to your speculations. It certainly makes for good reading.

Keep smiling
Redhead



To: David A. Irvine who wrote (3315)2/16/1998 1:55:00 PM
From: Jonathan Lebed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27968
 
How could there be so many shares outstanding? Most of the shares are restricted for at least a year. Could somebody else please explain....?

JLebed



To: David A. Irvine who wrote (3315)2/16/1998 2:04:00 PM
From: JIN CHUN  Respond to of 27968
 
David, welcome to the thread.

I agree with the general tone of your post. What get's me
personally is that as long as FAMH is showing any profit at all
for '97, they will mostly likely not have any drag on the revenue
from the acquisitions. Conservatively, Myriad
could bring in .06/share for '98, and that is without any
vertical or horizontal integration into the rest of FAMH and vice
versa.

FAMH is quite obviously geared towards acquiring new companies
that are profitable. I do not think that anyone can argue with
that, except to say that the management is so incompetent as to
spend money on buying companies that will lose money. This is
clearly, IMO, not what they are doing.

Why am I personally so excited about their prospects? As Jane
had mentioned in an earlier post, the risk vs. reward lies well
in my comfort zone. They do have a unique story, which is to
expand through profitable acquisitions in a market that is
rapidly growing, and will likely continue to grow as the labor
markets get tighter and tighter.

I reiterate a very important point in your post. These
acquisitions give a natural springboard for FAMH to expand quite
easily into more profitable placements throughout their offices
with minimal headaches and costs. With the Myriad acquisition,
they can easily streamline, integrate, and centralize payroll
services for the entire company. Bottomline? Reduced costs as
compared for '97 for the rest of FAMH's divisions. Myriad can
also offer their existing service line to the same companies that
FAMH's finance division now service, == increased customer base
and more revenue. With the soon to be acquisition of Tech Support
in CA( hopefully soon ), they can easily move and use the
existing intellectual and industry assets to offer similar type
placements in existing offices, especially since Richard Davis
tells us that IT placements in New York City is especially hot
right now. They already have solid contracts with major insurance
companies and banks in the New York area. It is easy for me to
see that integrating IT services to those existing
clients would be a no brainer. Remember, from the information
that we currently have, and given that the company has only been
public since May, their prospects for growth in '98 far
outshadows what their core business was in '97. The ability to
integrate services while expanding the service line throughout
their offices in '98 with increased presence within the industry
allows FAMH, IMO, to excel through '98. My fingers are tired.
Jin. ;-)



To: David A. Irvine who wrote (3315)2/17/1998 9:26:00 AM
From: Buckeye  Respond to of 27968
 
......Dave,

......Great post!