Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Montello Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JP who wrote (1562)	2/16/1998 8:39:00 PM
From: Sailfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4256

Thanks again JP... Will take a 'boo' at it... Just as "an aside", in an effort to brighten up our days...What MEO stockholders actually have going for them is a "two for the price of one" deal... That meaning, if ACA hits some 'nice ice' , then MEO of course will take off like a bat outta hell...AND, if MEO hits ANY kinda 'ice', it'll also take off like the same ol' bat... Remember also, that the inverse would also apply.... Kinda like the Doublemint commercial... Of course, the same would apply to any other company in the nearby vicinity of the ACA play... I'm outta here... Regards....Ray

To: JP who wrote (1562)	2/16/1998 10:49:00 PM
From: John B. Jones	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4256

JP stated: >> Linda says they are quite certain that they have kimberlite from the work carried out to date << Is a comment like this not a little irresponsible? Or are statements like this what MEO should be doing? From what I have learned (or obviously not learned) is that statements such as these are made by companies whose motives are a little less than honourable, or who have absolutely nothing and try to hype a little money out of investors before the truth gets out. Hell, I dunno - maybe I'm naive or something... John