Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Humble1 and Swing Trading Friends -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stuffbug who wrote (39622)	10/23/2023 4:59:55 PM
From: Tweets Boar Hog	1 Recommendation Recommended By SpedeReder Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41114

I did not name the cycles. JM Hurst did, and he has passed. I have a lot of admiration for all the work he did. This work is technical, difficult, not necessarily 100 % precise to say the least, and he did it back when computer programs were much less than friendly. He must have been quite talented, awa a workaholic. His output was quite voluminous. Some of his books and courses are available on Amazon. The actual length of the cycles is not something affixed in concrete, can vary from entity to entity. For example a lot of gold bugs speak of the 8 yr cycle (maybe closer to 7.9 yrs to be exact). I wonder ... some cycle affectionatos believe there is a 7 yr cycle as well. (9+7)/2 ~ 8. I do not subscribe to Merriman, might buy a book, some are not overly expensive. He and his crew do computations on the cycle lengths and update those, for various, once in while mention is given in the free weekly updates. A while back someone on X told Merriman it was all a bunch of hooey. Kind of lit a little fire in Merriman. Tweets This is from David Hickson, Sentient Trader. Hickson was not clear on the shorter cycles, suspect they are trading days. I don't use those so no matter to me really.