Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : GMD RESOURCE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RBMac who wrote (647)	2/17/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: Richnorth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1030

Ya got to be kidding, eh? I just don't understand why Fortune is still considered a "hype" when there is so much drill data available. The fact that "nothing" was found initially does not necessarily mean that nothing should be found there subsequently. Perhaps nothing was found the first time because poor equipment or poor techniques were employed and, later explorations yielded positive results apparently because mistakes of the past were avoided, etc. etc. Utterances of "hype" may well be instances of sour grapes on the part of unlucky, unsuccessful, incompetent or envious geologists. If they are convinced Fortune is all hype, they should do well to challenge Fortune and expose it for all to see. By doing so, they may even immortalize themselves!!! Don't forget that initial geological surveys had indicated anomalies on the Fortune site several years ago and preliminary explorations revealed the existence of an "Olympic-Dam" style of mineralization (like that in Australia) and subsequent drill data seem to support this conclusion. BTW, who were the guys who told you Fortune is all "hype"? I will be glad to make their acquaintance and learn as much as possible from them!!!!! They may save me a fortune!!!! Regards, Richnorth