SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pcstel who wrote (29927)11/17/2023 12:23:51 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29986
 
At half Globalstar's altitude, Starlink at 550 km has less free space path loss to deal with, but average distance of about 700 km means it's still a stretch compared with terrestrial cellular of 10s of metres or maybe a few kilometres. There's also going to be a lot of spectrum pollution when lots of people are trying to send data crowded for 600 km.

Long ago Tarken sent a SPOT location from the west coast of Rarotonga which had to travel maximum distance to Dubbo to report to me, so I know at least a bit of data can move. Over the last couple of decades no doubt sensitivity has improved so 700 km is doable. Far from town such as in Outback Australia or in airliners or on boats, it would be great - and as I said Globalstar should do quarter of a century ago. It was doable then even without sensitive latest devices.

But Starlink will no doubt do dumb pricing to stop it succeeding well. They don't know what price elasticity means so the die is cast.

Mqurice