Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IFMX - Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gregg who wrote (9499)	2/17/1998 12:11:00 AM
From: MJ	Respond to of 14631

Gregg, What is the 'internal' information you are talking about? Most of what this guy said just rehashes standard Informix sales pitch. ...perhaps the stuff about GM licencing? Matt.

To: Gregg who wrote (9499)	2/17/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: Lou	Respond to of 14631

Gregg, specificity in your response would help 1. You did not give the post number, so I am unsure as to whether it was the post that was quoted from Motley Fool. 2. If it is garbage as you suggest, why not refute it instead of just making a strong comment with the suggestion that some- one else send it to IFMX. There was a post where someone cited published sales activity, so you tell me, where should the lines be drawn on inside and outside information? 3. Would you please site the post, and I will try to get more information? We have lots of comments made on this thread. I have seen posters take the comments point by point and analyze them in a way that someone can understand. Your post didn't offer the specifics that are needed. 4. It was not the poster's opinion. I questioned him about it. His response was that it was public information having been posted at Motley Fool. I would suggest that you should go to the Motley Fool board for more information and/or comment. This would be helpful to me in avoiding reposting. The same thing could have been quoted by someone on SI, and it wouldn't have been any better or worse, but from my point of view it would be helful is you analyzed the post so that if there are gross errors, I can then just not repost for this individual. This would not of course, if it be, prevent inaccurate comments on this thread. Lou