SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (202772)12/8/2023 9:16:34 PM
From: carranza24 Recommendations

Recommended By
Haim R. Branisteanu
Old_Sparky
Pogeu Mahone
tntpal

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217607
 
More Aspen Beat:

theaspenbeat.com

Everyone has read the reports by now. On Oct. 7, Palestinian terrorists in Gaza called Hamas launched a surprise invasion of Israel. They shot, tortured, raped, beheaded and abducted every Jew they could find. Most were women, children and babies.

Over 1,200 Jews died, and countless more were injured. It was a Jewish pogrom, right out of the Middle Ages. The perpetrators filmed their gruesome bloodbath and gleefully posted it on the internet.

Hamas also took about 200 hostages back to the underground tunnels of Gaza, where they’ve been using them as human shields, trading them for Hamas terrorists captured by Israel, and torturing them to death.

Outrage is the world’s rightful response to this sick and sadistic massacre.

But not everyone feels that way. Ordinary Palestinians don’t feel that way at all. Polls show that 70-80% of the Palestinians in Gaza support the massacre.

Even among developed nations, a surprising number of otherwise civilized people are weak in their condemnation of the attack and ensuing atrocities.

Most disturbing is that on many America college campuses, the condemnation is not of Hamas, but of Israel. Groups well-funded by leftist organizations and individuals like George Soros have expressed sympathies for the massacre, going so far as to claim that it was justified on the grounds that Israel is a “colonizer” of land that is rightly Palestinian.

The position of these groups is that the land from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, which constitutes all of Israel, should be taken from the Jews and given instead to the Palestinians. Until that happens, they say any and all acts are permissible by the Palestinians and terrorist groups purporting to represent them such as Hamas.

Never mind that there is no concrete definition of who is a “Palestinian” and the term scarcely existed when the United Nations set up the nation of Israel in 1948. And never mind that the Palestinians have repeatedly rejected the “Two State Solution” where they get land to exist adjacent Israel. And never mind that Israel nonetheless turned Gaza over to them back in 2005 to effectively establish a Palestinian nation at the time without receiving anything in return from the Palestinians other than endless rocket bombardments.

And never mind that the Jews have suffered though 3,000 years of persecution when their ancestral lands were taken by, among others, the Babylonians, then the Romans, then the Ottomans, and then the British. And never mind that six million of them were murdered in Europe – about half their population there at the time – until the United Nations finally offered them a permanent home in the land of Abraham, Issac and Jacob.

Let’s never mind all that, and instead say hypothetically for a moment that the Palestinians are correct that they are the rightful owners of the land from the river to the sea, and Israel is wrong. Would that justify the murders, the rapes, the beheadings, the torture and the hostage-taking?

Here is where the Hamas sympathizers start to squirm and equivocate, at least the ones who are not psychopathic killers to the same degree as Hamas itself. They point to the low education levels of the Palestinians, their poverty, their status as oppressed people.

In other words, they point to their skin color.

Woke American college kids – and their woke professors and administrators and the other cool kids with whom the professors and administrators want to pal – reflexively and group-thinkingly side with people with dark skin. The Palestinians have it, and most Israelis don’t (though many do, and many are Arabs).

History doesn’t matter to these sympathizers, and atrocities don’t matter. All that matters is skin color.

I submit that this condescension to excuse horrific acts is not only wrong, it’s racist. It rests on the notion that people with dark skin living in poverty are unable to distinguish between right and wrong. They lack the intelligence to live in a civilized society. They are barbarians. They are savages.

But they’re not. The Palestinians have televisions, internet and schools, and they can read and write. They know right from wrong.They are ordinary people but have a grievance.

Lots of other people have grievances. I’m still smarting over the genocidal clearances of the Scottish Highlands. Japanese-Americans still grieve the incarceration of their ancestors in camps in California in WWII. Black Americans still grieve the enslavement of their ancestors a few hundred years ago and Jim Crow laws in the 20th century. Tibetans grieve the present-day occupation of their ancestral lands by the Chinese. For that matter, Jews still grieve the Holocaust, understandably.

But none of them think their grievances justify terrorism against civilian men, women and children.

Except the Palestinians. Like those other groups with grievances, Palestinians know right from wrong. But unlike those other aggrieved groups, the Palestinians consciously act wrong. They think, uniquely these days, that their grievances justify anything.

The Palestinians’ intentionally wrongful acts are enabled and even tangibly supported by their sympathizers. The sympathizers know the acts are wrong – even atrocious – but they excuse them as the ignorant and stupid acts of dark-skinned savages.

It’s the bigotry of low expectations. That bigotry has enabled a Jewish pogrom in the year 2023, and threatens another Jewish genocide.

Until their sympathizers demand that Palestinians act like the civilized people that they are fully capable of being, their sympathizers are collaborators in the Palestinian atrocities against the Jews, and racist in their view of Palestinians themselves.

But of course, the sympathizers don’t care about Jews and don’t care about Palestinians. All they care about is feeling and signaling the virtue that they vainly and mistakenly perceive in themselves.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (202772)12/16/2023 2:07:29 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217607
 
Hello MQ, you have been off of SI for nearly 1/12 of a year. I trust you have been busy in real space.

An update on Huawei, the company that would not go away ...

The company teases that it would introduce disruptive knowhow soon-enough, but did not say what. I reckon at least out-of-the-box quantum-key encryption protocol for the masses, maybe, and / or realtime AI language translation at tickbox selection, possibly, or BRIcs+ rollout of satellite texting, and constant-on BRI satellite voice, as all would be mere extensions of capabilities / capacities of the Mate 60 Pro functionalities already available in China.

Following on to Huawei chips chips chips
Message 34404388
New phone sparks worry China has found a way around U.S. tech limits
statista.com


scmp.com
Huawei teases ‘disruptive’ products in 2024 after surprise launch of Mate 60 5G smartphone series

gizmochina.com
Huawei Mate 60 Pro unveils Quantum Secure Call feature for encrypted calling over VoLTE
tech360.tv
How Satellite Calling Works on the Huawei Mate 60 Pro
gizmochina.com
Huawei Watch Ultimate Gold Edition launched in China; Supports Two-Way Satellite Connectivity


bloomberg.com

China’s iPhone Ban Accelerates Across Government and State Firms

- Agencies from Beijing to Tianjin instruct staff to go local
- The formal directives follow a general mandate from months ago


The much broader, coordinated effort marks a quickening of Beijing’s campaign to wean itself off American technology.

Photographer: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg

By Bloomberg News

16 December 2023 at 04:59 GMT+8
Updated on
16 December 2023 at 05:09 GMT+8

More Chinese agencies and government-backed firms across the country have ordered staff to stop bringing iPhones and other foreign devices to work, setting in motion an unprecedented prohibition that’s likely to block Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. from parts of the world’s biggest mobile market.

Multiple state firms and government departments across at least eight provinces — including the prosperous coast — instructed employees in the past month or two to start carrying local brands, according to people familiar with the matter. That’s a major step-up from around September, when a small number of agencies in Beijing and Tianjin began telling staff to leave foreign devices at home, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential orders.

The much broader, coordinated effort marks a dramatic quickening of Beijing’s campaign to wean itself off American technology, coinciding with the resurgent popularity of homegrown brand Huawei Technologies Co. Xi Jinping’s administration this year decided to expand a ban on foreign devices beyond the most sensitive departments — a directive that had been in place for years — to encompass many more government agencies and even state firms, Bloomberg News reported in September.

Apple shares dipped to a session low after Bloomberg reported on the widening bans. The stock fell less than 1% to $197.57 at the close Friday in New York and then declined further in after-hours trading. Apple had reached a record high earlier in the week.

While Chinese software and hardware have gradually replaced American products over the years — from Microsoft Corp. software to Dell computers and Intel Corp. chips — the edict threatens to deal a swift and direct hit to Apple’s market share.

This month, smaller firms and agencies in lower-tier cities have issued their own verbal directives, suggesting a much broader movement is kicking in, the people said. The orders originated from cities across at least eight provinces from prosperous Zhejiang, Guangdong, Jiangsu and Anhui to northern Shanxi, Shandong, Liaoning and central Hebei — home to the world’s largest iPhone factory.

China Remains a Critical Market for AppleSales from the region have roughly tripled over past decade


Sources: Company reports, Bloomberg

An Apple spokesperson declined to comment. The State Council Information Office and the Cyberspace Administration of China, which oversees online security, didn’t respond to faxed requests for comment.

The Chinese government has previously pushed back on reports about iPhone restrictions, while also raising concerns about the security of the device. “China has not issued laws and regulations to ban the purchase of Apple or foreign brands’ phones,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said during a press briefing in September.

It’s unclear how many government agencies precisely have issued directives, nor how widespread they’ve been. Different organizations will likely vary in how zealously they enforce internal edicts, with some forbidding Apple devices from the workplace and others barring their use entirely.

Collectively however, they present a major challenge for Samsung and Apple, which are both struggling to sustain growth in a key market. For Apple, which also uses China to produce the majority of its devices, the country yields about a fifth of its revenue.

Apple gets the majority of the world’s iPhones from sprawling factories run by suppliers like Foxconn Technology Group that together employ millions of Chinese. Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook was the architect of the company’s strategy to outsource manufacturing to China two decades ago. He has worked hard since to maintain positive ties with Beijing, even as Apple has begun shifting more production capacity to other countries including India.

Independent data has indicated that the iPhone 15 is selling worse in the country than the previous model, prompting some analysts to scale back revenue projections.

Analysts believe that part of the slowdown stems from the August release of a Huawei smartphone that contained an advanced made-in-China processor. State media celebrated it as a triumph against US sanctions, while American lawmakers called for an investigation into possible violations of those curbs.

While Apple’s revenue from Greater China fell 2% in the fourth quarter, the company blamed the decline on the iPad and Mac. Cook said the iPhone 15 Pro did well in the region and that is is “very optimistic” about the company’s performance there. Apple still enjoys popularity in China and its devices remain common in both the government and private sector.

Chinese state firms like oil giant PetroChina Co. employ millions and still control vast swaths of a centrally planned economy. The state sector provides jobs for an estimated 80 million people and the figure could have grown by as much as 2 million on a net basis in 2022. Government agencies employ millions more.

What Bloomberg Intelligence SaysThe possibility of weak iPhone sales in China is a risk to Apple’s financial performance in 2024, but our analysis indicates that the $7.4 billion drop in consensus sales since fiscal 4Q23 results adequately accounts for that threat. We expect more press coverage of Huawei’s success in China versus Apple, which is supported by our own smartphone survey, but see little risk of more estimate cuts.

Even with US-China ties fraying, the US company is highly dependent on the Asian country — both as a manufacturing partner and a market for its products. Cook celebrated that relationship during a trip to China earlier this year, calling it “symbiotic.”

But the blockade on the devices is the culmination of a yearslong effort to root out foreign technology in sensitive environments, and coincides with China’s push to become self-sufficient in critical areas.

In 2022, Beijing ordered central government agencies and state-backed corporations to replace foreign-branded personal computers with domestic alternatives within two years, marking one of the most aggressive efforts to eradicate key overseas technology from within its most sensitive organs.

— With assistance from Steven Yang and Debby Wu