Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Harvard Scientific (HVSF)Hot$$- male impotency medicine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zakattack who wrote (3273)	2/17/1998 3:48:00 AM
From: Batman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3906

...............atomic batteries to power...............turbines to speed............. This is Batman. Now if only Gene Martineau would crawl out from under a rock . . . Regine: good to see that you are back. You have been one of the most prolific posters on this thread, from the very beginning when this stock was at $9 per share. Good to see that you are, as usual, deliriously happy with this stock even though it is only pennies away from an all-time low. Considering that you posted from the beginning, you've got to be sitting on some pretty nice losses (assuming you even own stock, or weren't given it for free by Waite and See which would explain your happiness no matter what the price), which makes your delirium inexplicable . . . unless . . . unless . . . unless you're a front for HVSF. Just don't make any sense. Doesn't pass the smell test. Care to comment? Answer the following question: how do losses make you happy? (unless you are one of Waite and See's incarnations) I think you will find that most investors are happy with profits, not losses (but perhaps you are on another planet where this law of investing doesn't hold)). Also, most of the people that bought into this stock have average purchase prices in the $6 to $9 range ($60-$90 post-split), thus your posts are irrelevant to them. No doubt you will post that you bought heavily in the first week of January, and, voila, your average price is now 30 cents per share. Zak, good to see that you are back. We're both long this stock, buddy. Good to see that we are standing shoulder-to-shoulder, criminal-to-criminal. Actually, I feel quite bullish on this stock (but not the company) at this point. Waite and See have simply brazened it out over the revelations of a fugitive on their board of directors. It has been posted that the volume was low this past week, therefore I could not have gotten into this stock in size. Answer: I AM long but I never said that I would go into this thing in size (I would need my head examined if I did--there's no guarantee that the bid would hold when it came time to sell). But I am long and bullish, so therefore I should do my bit and initiate a forward-looking (at least I am willing to preface my posts with this term, unlike others on this thread who are required by law to do so, but don't) discussion on the future stock price of HVSF. Perhaps a take-over is in wings? Perhaps Bill Gates has been looking over this stock as the "next Microsoft in biotechnology". Perhaps the Rockefellers are looking at making an investment. So, I kick off a take-over discussion. Afaq, would you care to comment? I pass the ball to you. Batman