SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PKRBKR who wrote (1426980)12/1/2023 4:03:23 PM
From: Eric  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572469
 
Any kid who took a high school class in physics could easily answer that question.

Did you take any physics in school?



To: PKRBKR who wrote (1426980)12/1/2023 6:09:28 PM
From: Eric2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Doren
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572469
 
Tell you what.

I'll help you out.

Let's take a "state of the art" condensing NG furnace that's input BTU's is 100,000 with a typical efficiency of 95%.

I'll eliminate the fan motor used to reject the heat from the heat exchanger so the actual output heat is 100,000 x0.95 = 95,000 BTU's of heat delivered to the house.

Now take a very efficient combined cycle NG fired power plant at about 60% in the conversion process to electrical power.

My heat pump has a COP of 3.5 at 47 degrees F OAT (outside air temp).

So if I took the electrons from that NG fired combined cycle power plant the numbers would be this.

0.60 X 3.5 = 2.1

I'm achieving roughly 200,000 BTU's of effective heating out of the same 100,000 BTU's being burned by that NG fired furnace in the house.

Now I didn't include the electric fan motor on the outside compressor (heat pump) unit and the electric motor in the inside the house air handler.

Virtually twice the heat

Now I get my electrons from a couple of different sources. My hydropower is dirt cheap. Much cheaper than NG.

Or the Sun direct to PV's.

NG loses every time.