To: Qone0 who wrote (83012 ) 12/3/2023 7:29:43 PM From: jpdunwell 1 RecommendationRecommended By
Read Replies (2) | Respond to They are the anti-vax media algo's and anti liberal media algo's that keep your fear fed. They populate your feed using your likes and follows to send you more. Until you can't see any other reasoning other than what you are being fed. Now you're really showing your ignorance. I don't even have a Twitter account, and I don't do likes or follows. Another baseless assumption blown apart. I do think you should look in the mirror and consider your own arguments when contemplating your reflection.You do find it offensive, you see yourself as the keeper and spreader of the truth, conversion to your beliefs is important to you. Your opinion of me means absolutely nothing to me, as I don't know you at all. What I do know about you is that you are a presumptuous, pompous ass who's unable to consider anything outside his small world, and thinks anyone who disagrees with him is wrong. Your quote on Musk. And that equates to worshiping him? That's quite a stretch. I guess that means you have a problem with the government censorship being exposed, and believe they should be able to decide what you should and shouldn't see, even when factual. Since we're so freely delving into pyschoanalysis here, it seems you have some deep-rooted issues with Musk that perhaps you should consult with someone on. I didn't make any attempt to defend Musk against Ziehan's personal accusations, and have no interest in doing so. My sole point was in regards to the censorship, which interestingly enough, not one single person who's criticized my posts has cared to comment about. No one has disputed that this occurred (which would be hard to do, since it's well-documented), and tellingly no one, including you, has expressed any issue with said censorship. That pretty much says it all so far as where you're coming from. Instead, you choose to blather on about anti-vax algo's, leaving out any mention of the censorship, blacklisting of top professionals, and shadow-banning algos that have now been openly exposed. I guess you're fine with allowing others to do your thinking and decide your truths for you, and this is certainly reflective in the thinking (or lack thereof) you display here. The vaccine was world wide, but the conspiracy was a psy-op to divide Americans. This is clearly politically driven by conservative media as it was fed to you step by step. Algo after algo. My, but you really are small-minded, aren't you? The two don't have to be mutually exclusive. I guess you missed the human rights demonstrations taking place in other countries that also worked to exclude the unvaccinated from society? Oh yes, there were algos at work alright, and that's been demonstrated. Why don't you check out Berenson vs. Twitter, just for starts? There's lots more suits underway now, but you're too blinded to acknowledge those. The algo's now own you, next you will quote vaers stats that will contain twisted data. And this will go on forever. Too late, I quoted VAERS stats here years ago directly from the CDC's own data, which I will agree can certainly be twisted at times. In case you haven't noticed, there are many, many countries now ratcheting back on their recommendations of the jabs, and even health officials from countries such as Germany and the UK have stated the risk-reward analysis is unfavorable for the majority of demographics. Of course, the US is still pushing the useless jabs for children, which should tell you all you need to know about their ability to "follow the science". Maybe the algos own you, and you're one of the less than 5% still taking the CDC/FDA at their word and taking the jab every few months? Most have now seen through the farce, as clearly witnessed by the numbers. I guess there's a lot of conspiracy quacks out there now, hmmm?
