Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (1427330)	12/4/2023 7:40:54 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1573924

“In this study, VOCs [volatile organic compounds] generated from various types of masks, including commonly used KF94 disposable masks, were assessed. The types and concentrations of VOCs that humans are likely to be exposed to from these masks under various conditions (i.e., emission time, temperature, and mask types) were calculated and compared. This study demonstrated that disposable masks (KF94) released higher concentrations of TVOCs in comparison to cotton masks, with values of 3730?±?1331?µg?m–3 for KF94 and 268?±?51.6?µg?m–3 for cotton masks. The concentrations of TVOCs in KF94 masks are high enough to pose a concern based on indoor air quality guidelines established by the German Federal Environment Agency… It is clear that particular attention must be paid to the VOCs associated with the use of KF94 masks their effects on human health.” __ How is that deflection? Your knowledge of basic English is staggering. So when you get skewered for making false claims about the website you just make more false claims... The topic is how safe N95's are and do the masks cause more harm than good. Not who made the mask.